Welcome aboard Visitor...

Daily Screenshot

Server Costs Target


Target met!

Latest Topics

- Anyone still playing from a decade ago or longer? »
- Game still active. NICE! »
- Password resett »
- Darkspace Idea/Opinion Submission Thread »
- Rank Bug maybe? »
- Next patch .... »
- Nobody will remember me...but. »
- 22 years...asking for help from one community to another »
- DS on Ubuntu? »
- Medal Breakpoints »

Development Blog

- Roadmap »
- Hello strangers, it’s been a while... »
- State of DarkSpace Development »
- Potential planetary interdictor changes! »
- The Silent Cartographer »

Combat Kills

Combat kills in last 24 hours:
No kills today... yet.

Upcoming Events

- Weekly DarkSpace
04/27/24 +2.2 Hours

Search

Anniversaries

No anniversaries today.

Social Media

Why not join us on Discord for a chat, or follow us on Twitter or Facebook for more information and fan updates?

Network

DarkSpace
DarkSpace - Beta
Palestar

[FAQ
Forum Index » » Diplomacy » » The Faction Change Of Pitch Black
Goto page ( Previous Page 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 )
 Author The Faction Change Of Pitch Black
Darksworde
Marshal
Pitch Black


Joined: September 06, 2002
Posts: 806
From: The Zoo
Posted: 2003-08-04 10:30   
lol ragg, i have to agree with u as well. We do what is necessary to win, not to have a good game when it comes to the MV.

If this means ECM Forts or fluxing you guys to hell and back, we will do it. If this means rotating raxs on a planet or pulsing bombs in a sensor frigate, we will do it.

We complain about each other and always target the other on purpose, i know that for a fact. I also know, if we were to trade places, we would be doing exactly what the other was doing to prevent us from capping, etc

I take this as a compliment, as it means you have to turn to last resort tactics to stop us, meaning we are must be doing somthing right.

There are 2 comments i would however like to point out for u.

Firstly, pls stop swearing in MV so much. This aint doing u any favours

Secondly, like i realised when i was ICC, the teamwork over there is severely lacking, as is the experience. Maybe now, u realise that the difference in factions is not ship base, but rather the player base.


_________________
Live by the sworde, die by the sworde

  Email Darksworde   Goto the website of Darksworde
Ragglock
Marshal
BIOnics Industry Syndicate

Joined: May 29, 2001
Posts: 1955
From: Denmark
Posted: 2003-08-04 10:48   
i have never had other oppnion than its the players and not the ships that make up if you can win , as when i was on kluth now on icc. fleets rule not ballance of ships and weapons in the end.

i can say directly thay icc they are good ships and actuly fun to fly (if they last more than 5 sek in battel )

so you dont have to prech it to me


_________________
P:@12 C:$38



LOVE the smell of human flesh in the morning smells like MVictory



  Goto the website of Ragglock
Keyser Soze
Marshal
Pitch Black


Joined: August 28, 2002
Posts: 222
From: Ft. Myers, FL
Posted: 2003-08-04 11:11   
It's too bad that the player base that A) plays the least in the MV and B) complains the most in lobby and forum [namely ICC]

Is getting just what they want - kluth nerfed and ugto left alone and icc either strengthened somewhat or a lot (depending on whose opinion you listen to)

My question is: Will the non-existent (except for Ragg and his crew) ICC player base finally stop whining and play MV when the patch comes out? or will they continue to camp the lobby, complain about the game, and post inane topics in the forums?

We shall see.......
_________________


Goto page ( Previous Page 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 )
Page created in 0.008560 seconds.


Copyright © 2000 - 2024 Palestar Inc. All rights reserved worldwide.
Terms of use - DarkSpace is a Registered Trademark of PALESTAR