Welcome aboard Visitor...

Daily Screenshot

Server Costs Target


Target met!

Latest Topics

- Anyone still playing from a decade ago or longer? »
- Game still active. NICE! »
- Password resett »
- Darkspace Idea/Opinion Submission Thread »
- Rank Bug maybe? »
- Next patch .... »
- Nobody will remember me...but. »
- 22 years...asking for help from one community to another »
- DS on Ubuntu? »
- Medal Breakpoints »

Development Blog

- Roadmap »
- Hello strangers, it’s been a while... »
- State of DarkSpace Development »
- Potential planetary interdictor changes! »
- The Silent Cartographer »

Combat Kills

Combat kills in last 24 hours:
No kills today... yet.

Upcoming Events

- Weekly DarkSpace
05/04/24 +4.0 Days

Search

Anniversaries

22th - Tellaris
17th - Oskar von Reuenthal

Social Media

Why not join us on Discord for a chat, or follow us on Twitter or Facebook for more information and fan updates?

Network

DarkSpace
DarkSpace - Beta
Palestar

[FAQ
Forum Index » » Developer Feedback » » Replace the Command Carrier
Goto page ( Previous Page 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 )
 Author Replace the Command Carrier
Jim Starluck
Marshal
Templar Knights


Joined: October 22, 2001
Posts: 2232
From: Cincinnati, OH
Posted: 2012-06-25 00:58   
How about instead of removing the CC and replacing it, we just add in a new ship? Perhaps something like this?



M-412L/N Flag Dreadnought

As the Fourth Stellar War has dragged on into its twelfth year, Confederate strategists have noticed that the elderly M-318C/N Command Carriers are vulnerable to attack, especially against the K'luth. Traditional doctrine called for 318s to be held behind the primary capital lines, far enough back that it would be costly for the UGTO to attack them but near enough to coordinate the fleet. An enemy that can attack wherever and whenever they prefer without warning is far more difficult to defend against. After half a dozen high-ranking admirals went down with their ships in as many months, Shi Jie Yards were asked to produce a command ship that could operate in company with the main capital fleet rather than behind it. The new M-412L/Ns carry a heavy railgun battery and are already proving effective in front-line combat, though some traditionalists prefer to continue using the old 318s regardless of the risk.



It'll be like sticking Command Modules on a Combat Dread.



[ This Message was edited by: Jim Starluck on 2012-06-25 01:26 ]
_________________
If at first you don't succeed, get a bigger space battleship and try again.

  Email Jim Starluck
Kenny_Naboo
Marshal
Pitch Black


Joined: January 11, 2010
Posts: 3823
From: LobsterTown
Posted: 2012-06-25 02:10   
Quote:

On 2012-06-25 00:58, Jim Starluck wrote:
How about instead of removing the CC and replacing it, we just add in a new ship? Perhaps something like this?



M-412L/N Flag Dreadnought

As the Fourth Stellar War has dragged on into its twelfth year, Confederate strategists have noticed that the elderly M-318C/N Command Carriers are vulnerable to attack, especially against the K'luth. Traditional doctrine called for 318s to be held behind the primary capital lines, far enough back that it would be costly for the UGTO to attack them but near enough to coordinate the fleet. An enemy that can attack wherever and whenever they prefer without warning is far more difficult to defend against. After half a dozen high-ranking admirals went down with their ships in as many months, Shi Jie Yards were asked to produce a command ship that could operate in company with the main capital fleet rather than behind it. The new M-412L/Ns carry a heavy railgun battery and are already proving effective in front-line combat, though some traditionalists prefer to continue using the old 318s regardless of the risk.



It'll be like sticking Command Modules on a Combat Dread.



[ This Message was edited by: Jim Starluck on 2012-06-25 01:26 ]




Just waiting for UGTO to QQ why they don't have the same for their BD.





_________________
... in space, no one can hear you scream.....


Blackjack [DBL]
Grand Admiral
Faster than Light


Joined: February 25, 2011
Posts: 344
From: The land of venomous reptiles.
Posted: 2012-06-25 02:14   
I like that idea Jim. Maybe compared to the normal combat dread, it loses a couple of railguns to fit in the device.
_________________

Names I used: Da Bes Loser, Perseverance, Loyalty.

[ML]RogueAvengerTTV
Marshal

Joined: September 11, 2010
Posts: 300
From: England
Posted: 2012-06-25 02:38   
Quote:

On 2012-06-25 02:10, Kenny_Naboo[+R] wrote:
Quote:

On 2012-06-25 00:58, Jim Starluck wrote:
How about instead of removing the CC and replacing it, we just add in a new ship? Perhaps something like this?



M-412L/N Flag Dreadnought

As the Fourth Stellar War has dragged on into its twelfth year, Confederate strategists have noticed that the elderly M-318C/N Command Carriers are vulnerable to attack, especially against the K'luth. Traditional doctrine called for 318s to be held behind the primary capital lines, far enough back that it would be costly for the UGTO to attack them but near enough to coordinate the fleet. An enemy that can attack wherever and whenever they prefer without warning is far more difficult to defend against. After half a dozen high-ranking admirals went down with their ships in as many months, Shi Jie Yards were asked to produce a command ship that could operate in company with the main capital fleet rather than behind it. The new M-412L/Ns carry a heavy railgun battery and are already proving effective in front-line combat, though some traditionalists prefer to continue using the old 318s regardless of the risk.



It'll be like sticking Command Modules on a Combat Dread.



[ This Message was edited by: Jim Starluck on 2012-06-25 01:26 ]




Just waiting for UGTO to QQ why they don't have the same for their BD.









You sir are wrong if you ask any unto player that has played with the command dread then even seem the CC they agree that it's lacking this idea makes it deceit the UGTO command dread IS a BD without the core weapons and with more eccm /mines IMO the icc combat dread makes a grate base for the command dread better model and weapon loadout to start with
_________________


  Email [ML]RogueAvengerTTV
Bardiche
Chief Marshal

Joined: November 16, 2006
Posts: 1247
Posted: 2012-06-25 05:55   
Well that's all I really wanted. EDIT: Won't that further make ICC's amount of option out of whack, or will we call it a feature now?
[ This Message was edited by: Bardiche on 2012-06-25 06:18 ]
_________________


Talien
Marshal
Templar Knights


Joined: May 11, 2010
Posts: 2044
From: Michigan
Posted: 2012-06-25 09:54   
Sounds good to me, but what ship is getting scrapped to add it in(Bomber Corvette?), or are UGTO/Luth going to be getting a new ship too?
_________________
Adapt or die.

DiepLuc
Chief Marshal

Joined: March 23, 2010
Posts: 1187
Posted: 2012-06-25 10:34   
Quote:
On 2012-06-25 00:58, Jim Starluck wrote:
M-412L/N Flag Dreadnought

As the Fourth Stellar War has dragged on into its twelfth year, Confederate strategists have noticed that the elderly M-318C/N Command Carriers are vulnerable to attack, especially against the K'luth.
The new M-412L/Ns carry a heavy railgun battery and are already proving effective in front-line combat, though some traditionalists prefer to continue using the old 318s regardless of the risk.


The problem with 318C remains. And 412L raises new problems.

I guess 412L is typically alike 318C but fighters are replaced by dual-arcs heavy railgun. Looks like 412L shall be a hydrid between Carrier and Combat dread.
_________________


[ML]RogueAvengerTTV
Marshal

Joined: September 11, 2010
Posts: 300
From: England
Posted: 2012-06-25 11:19   
Quote:

On 2012-06-25 09:54, Talien wrote:
Sounds good to me, but what ship is getting scrapped to add it in(Bomber Corvette?), or are UGTO/Luth going to be getting a new ship too?



i would think if its a "redo" of the current CC it would replace it as the older one would be decomissiond ?
_________________


  Email [ML]RogueAvengerTTV
Talien
Marshal
Templar Knights


Joined: May 11, 2010
Posts: 2044
From: Michigan
Posted: 2012-06-25 12:14   
Quote:

On 2012-06-25 11:19, [UWS]RogueAvenger[CMD] wrote:
i would think if its a "redo" of the current CC it would replace it as the older one would be decomissiond ?



From what Jim said it looks like it would be adding a new command ship and keeping the CC as is, as it's not a new Carrier but something else entirely.
_________________
Adapt or die.

Brutality
Marshal

Joined: May 25, 2009
Posts: 659
From: Alaska, USA
Posted: 2012-06-25 13:57   
Sounds like a pretty interesting configuration and a good solution to the current problem. Definitely sounds like this new configuration will be able to hold its own on the battlefield.
_________________


Bardiche
Chief Marshal

Joined: November 16, 2006
Posts: 1247
Posted: 2012-06-25 14:12   
All hail Flag.
[ This Message was edited by: Bardiche on 2012-06-25 17:23 ]
_________________


Jim Starluck
Marshal
Templar Knights


Joined: October 22, 2001
Posts: 2232
From: Cincinnati, OH
Posted: 2012-06-25 15:08   
Quote:

On 2012-06-25 02:14, Loyalty *TO* wrote:
I like that idea Jim. Maybe compared to the normal combat dread, it loses a couple of railguns to fit in the device.



What it loses compared to the Combat Dread are the Ion Cannons. It has just Railguns, with no Ions to back them up.

Quote:

On 2012-06-25 10:34, chlorophyll wrote:
The problem with 318C remains. And 412L raises new problems.

I guess 412L is typically alike 318C but fighters are replaced by dual-arcs heavy railgun. Looks like 412L shall be a hydrid between Carrier and Combat dread.


Strictly speaking, both the 412 and the 318 are hybrids. It's just that one is a hybrid command/gunship, while the other is a hybrid command/carrier.



[ This Message was edited by: Jim Starluck on 2012-06-25 15:08 ]
_________________
If at first you don't succeed, get a bigger space battleship and try again.

  Email Jim Starluck
Talien
Marshal
Templar Knights


Joined: May 11, 2010
Posts: 2044
From: Michigan
Posted: 2012-06-25 15:19   
Wait, so ICC will have 2 command ships? Why not toss the command gadget from the CC, change the name (Heavy Carrier, Fleet Carrier?), and add a couple more fighter bays? In it's current config It's only real use is as something to build with in a combat zone, and if it loses the mining beams and build drones for the command gadget then even that use is gone.
_________________
Adapt or die.

Mylith
Grand Admiral
Faster than Light


Joined: July 19, 2011
Posts: 507
From: Hivarin, CD+36*15693
Posted: 2012-06-25 15:23   
Quote:

On 2012-06-25 00:58, Jim Starluck wrote:
How about instead of removing the CC and replacing it, we just add in a new ship? Perhaps something like this?



M-412L/N Flag Dreadnought

As the Fourth Stellar War has dragged on into its twelfth year, Confederate strategists have noticed that the elderly M-318C/N Command Carriers are vulnerable to attack, especially against the K'luth. Traditional doctrine called for 318s to be held behind the primary capital lines, far enough back that it would be costly for the UGTO to attack them but near enough to coordinate the fleet. An enemy that can attack wherever and whenever they prefer without warning is far more difficult to defend against. After half a dozen high-ranking admirals went down with their ships in as many months, Shi Jie Yards were asked to produce a command ship that could operate in company with the main capital fleet rather than behind it. The new M-412L/Ns carry a heavy railgun battery and are already proving effective in front-line combat, though some traditionalists prefer to continue using the old 318s regardless of the risk.



It'll be like sticking Command Modules on a Combat Dread.



[ This Message was edited by: Jim Starluck on 2012-06-25 01:26 ]



AWESOME.


_________________

http://twitter.com/DarkSpace7

Goto page ( Previous Page 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 )
Page created in 0.022436 seconds.


Copyright © 2000 - 2024 Palestar Inc. All rights reserved worldwide.
Terms of use - DarkSpace is a Registered Trademark of PALESTAR