| Author |
"Realistic" order of battle |
CM7
Midshipman
Faster than Light
Joined: October 15, 2009
Posts: 1812
|  Posted: 2012-01-06 22:42
it was recended because it hurt ugto more than anticipated. where icc has pulse tec and kluth have super vbutton, ugto was left naked
_________________
Defiance and Opposition, a tribute to teamwork. I will remember always
339,144
|
NoBoDx
Grand Admiral
Joined: October 14, 2003
Posts: 784
From: Germany / NRW
| Posted: 2012-02-10 04:49
i suggested anti-capital ships ages ago
small ships (scouts / frigs) with a slow reloading, heavy damaging, close-range missile
they must be fired within beam-range and move rather slow
they can be shot down with pd, but if one missile make it through, the dread should have more than a dent
_________________
The only good 'ooman is a dead 'ooman. An' da only fing better than a dead 'ooman'z a dyin' 'ooman who tell you where ter find 'is mates.
|
Evil Android #6
2nd Rear Admiral
Joined: February 12, 2010
Posts: 16
| Posted: 2012-02-17 06:02
i think changing dmg capabilities would force a mass dessie spam again...could be fun
but on the other hand an easier solution would be a bonus system. What if ur faction has 3 stations and a cruiser? your prestige gain would remain normal if you pick a cruiser or dreadnought, prestige gain is less with a station, and prestige gain would be more then regular in a dessie or under. using a comparison counter with a reference value can do this. like 5 ships total with 2 stats is 2/5 x100% = 40%. station ref value is 15%, so the stations all get less prestige gain.
of course the bonus can get expanded with faster reps or something. But its the first concept that matters:
give ppl a small bonus for picking the small ships at times there are lotsa big ships.
_________________
|
English
Deutsch
Nederlands
)
