Welcome aboard Visitor...

Daily Screenshot

Server Costs Target


9% of target met.

Latest Topics

- Anyone still playing from a decade ago or longer? »
- Game still active. NICE! »
- Password resett »
- Darkspace Idea/Opinion Submission Thread »
- Rank Bug maybe? »
- Next patch .... »
- Nobody will remember me...but. »
- 22 years...asking for help from one community to another »
- DS on Ubuntu? »
- Medal Breakpoints »

Development Blog

- Roadmap »
- Hello strangers, it’s been a while... »
- State of DarkSpace Development »
- Potential planetary interdictor changes! »
- The Silent Cartographer »

Combat Kills

Combat kills in last 24 hours:
No kills today... yet.

Upcoming Events

- Weekly DarkSpace
05/04/24 +2.7 Days

Search

Anniversaries

No anniversaries today.

Social Media

Why not join us on Discord for a chat, or follow us on Twitter or Facebook for more information and fan updates?

Network

DarkSpace
DarkSpace - Beta
Palestar

[FAQ
Forum Index » » General Support » » PSMs & XB-11s
Goto page ( 1 | 2 Next Page )
 Author PSMs & XB-11s
Rebel Retribution
Grand Admiral

Joined: January 23, 2006
Posts: 41
From: Hillsboro, OR
Posted: 2011-05-30 16:08   
I have noticed that both PSMs and the fighter bombers the ICC have (XB-11 i think its called) dont do any dmg to inf or the buildings they were impacting. And before u say its lag i was the only person in the system and I saw the impacts with the planet surface.
[ This Message was edited by: Line of Eld on 2011-05-30 16:08 ]
_________________
Grand Admiral of the assualt ship C.S.S. ADN-91 Nikoli Tesla and Fleet Flag Ship C.S.S. CC-289 Robert Goddard
\"Si vis pacem para bellum\"

  Email Rebel Retribution
*FTL*Soulless
Marshal

Joined: June 25, 2010
Posts: 787
From: Dres-Kona
Posted: 2011-05-30 16:13   
yeah i have noticed that too
_________________
We are Back from the shadows.


  Email *FTL*Soulless
[ML]RogueAvengerTTV
Marshal

Joined: September 11, 2010
Posts: 300
From: England
Posted: 2011-05-30 16:26   
+1 ive seen this no damge to inf or structure at all
_________________


  Email [ML]RogueAvengerTTV
DiepLuc
Chief Marshal

Joined: March 23, 2010
Posts: 1187
Posted: 2011-05-31 01:17   
It has been said in other topic.

Due to the improvement in missle tracking code (see Development log), PSM explodes further than its splash range to the target (I assume). And since Seige Dreadnaught is the only ship affordable to launch PSM, therefore don't feel it like a big problem, I doubt if anyone keeps SD in garrage and actually use it to bomb.

Any bomber fighter sucks now. I bet you know bomb's strength based on ship level and fighter has level 0, that's why bomber bomb is not only few (2 per volley) but also too weak.

I believe we just pick bomber fro and lay all hopes on mIRVS & ECM.

Staff blesses bombing!
_________________


*FTL*Soulless
Marshal

Joined: June 25, 2010
Posts: 787
From: Dres-Kona
Posted: 2011-05-31 05:17   
Quote:

On 2011-05-31 01:17, chlorophyll wrote:
It has been said in other topic.

Due to the improvement in missle tracking code (see Development log), PSM explodes further than its splash range to the target (I assume). And since Seige Dreadnaught is the only ship affordable to launch PSM, therefore don't feel it like a big problem, I doubt if anyone keeps SD in garrage and actually use it to bomb.

Any bomber fighter sucks now. I bet you know bomb's strength based on ship level and fighter has level 0, that's why bomber bomb is not only few (2 per volley) but also too weak.

I believe we just pick bomber fro and lay all hopes on mIRVS & ECM.

Staff blesses bombing!



Thats why we use the bomber Frigate anything else dies before it provides any results. and Its FREE
_________________
We are Back from the shadows.


  Email *FTL*Soulless
Botoru
Grand Admiral

Joined: January 25, 2011
Posts: 84
From: England
Posted: 2011-05-31 06:11   
I noticed that too. I was bombing a planet with B-27s and mothing seemed to happen. They are useless.
_________________
Formerly Admiral Sideswipe {Elite Firebolt}

Fatal Perihelion
Chief Marshal
Fatal Squadron


Joined: April 15, 2010
Posts: 308
Posted: 2011-05-31 08:37   
Last week i used PSMs on the MD, they work at the rigt angle but are very weak and as there are only 5 PSM a slot, you will need permanent resupply.
_________________


CM7
Midshipman
Faster than Light


Joined: October 15, 2009
Posts: 1812
Posted: 2011-05-31 10:36   
i have a SD in garage... I wont be using the PSMs thouhg.
_________________
Defiance and Opposition, a tribute to teamwork. I will remember always
339,144

Talien
Marshal
Templar Knights


Joined: May 11, 2010
Posts: 2044
From: Michigan
Posted: 2011-05-31 11:23   
I don't know why people think it's a bad ship. Sure if you're trying to solo bomb in MV it's a bad choice because it's slow and easily noticed but a SD can be given ECM cover by a Bomber Frigate, and those two working in tandem can easily decimate most of a planet before the other side knows it's being bombed. It's especially effective in scen or home servers where there's usually not a lot of enemy players, just jump a few thousand GU out, fly in under ECM, make one pass, then jump out and watch most of the planet die.

Of course with PSMs this should be even easier, firing them at max range from under ECM cover you should be out of ammo and jumping away by the time the second volley hits. I suppose one benefit of the current broken PSMs is they decimate the population without doing much structural damage, so it's good for dropping tech to disable defenses and make it easier to capture so you don't have to rebuild everything.
_________________
Adapt or die.

Azreal
Chief Marshal

Joined: March 14, 2004
Posts: 2816
From: United State of Texas, Houston
Posted: 2011-05-31 18:40   
it is a bad ship because the main reason you pull it is bugged 50% of the time or more. It isn't about the loadout. Its about the waste of time.
_________________
bucket link



  Email Azreal   Goto the website of Azreal
Gejaheline
Fleet Admiral
Galactic Navy


Joined: March 19, 2005
Posts: 1127
From: UGTO MUNIN HQ, Mars
Posted: 2011-06-01 07:36   
Quote:

On 2011-05-31 01:17, chlorophyll wrote:
It has been said in other topic.

Due to the improvement in missle tracking code (see Development log), PSM explodes further than its splash range to the target (I assume)...

I bet you know bomb's strength based on ship level and fighter has level 0, that's why bomber bomb is not only few (2 per volley) but also too weak...



[Citation needed]
_________________
[Darkspace Moderator] [Galactic Navy Fleet Officer]


Fatal Perihelion
Chief Marshal
Fatal Squadron


Joined: April 15, 2010
Posts: 308
Posted: 2011-06-01 08:12   
Quote:

Of course with PSMs this should be even easier, firing them at max range from under ECM cover you should be out of ammo and jumping away by the time the second volley hits. I suppose one benefit of the current broken PSMs is they decimate the population without doing much structural damage, so it's good for dropping tech to disable defenses and make it easier to capture so you don't have to rebuild everything.




Psst: You should only jump out if an aly keeps a scanner up. Otherwise your PSMs will explode when they lose track on the building. pssst


edit:Maybe this ^ is wrong. I am ot sure anymore, but mirvs will explode if a planets building turns out of their max range.
[ This Message was edited by: Fatal Perihelion on 2011-06-01 11:14 ]
_________________


DiepLuc
Chief Marshal

Joined: March 23, 2010
Posts: 1187
Posted: 2011-06-01 13:47   
Quote:
On 2011-06-01 07:36, Gejaheline wrote:
Quote:
On 2011-05-31 01:17, chlorophyll wrote:
Due to the improvement in missle tracking code (see Development log), PSM explodes further than its splash range to the target (I assume)...

I bet you know bomb's strength based on ship level and fighter has level 0, that's why bomber bomb is not only few (2 per volley) but also too weak...


[Citation needed]


I wrote "assume" in bold.
I read in a topic where BackSlash said he saw PSM exploded 100gu before it reached the structure, while its splash range is 30gu. That's why I have that assumption. It's my bad.

Fighter does not have level 0, yep. On a chat in lobby, Eledore hinted that fighter is the ship that has lowest hull level, and can be considered level 0. I apply the satire in my post. My 2nd bad.

After all, bomber fri is still the best bomber in game. It's invisible, it's fast, it's free - 3 significant key points. Whether has supply or not, it can work on its own, and you don't worry to lose it.

Developers might adjust PSM and bomber fighter. However, bomber frigate is still the queen of bombing. Perhaps remove 1 from 3 ECM may fix its excellence.
_________________


MrSparkle
Marshal

Joined: August 13, 2001
Posts: 1912
From: mrsparkle
Posted: 2011-06-01 13:52   
Not sure anyone knows if fighters adopt the level of their mother ship. They should if they don't, but going by current fighter bombers it's impossible to tell.

I tried wasp hoards a while ago, and not only did they do pitiful damage, they also only fired 1 round of bombs. After that they'd continue to circle and make their attack runs, but no more bombs.

Just not worth using now.
_________________


Talien
Marshal
Templar Knights


Joined: May 11, 2010
Posts: 2044
From: Michigan
Posted: 2011-06-01 14:40   
Quote:

On 2011-06-01 08:12, Fatal Perihelion wrote:

Psst: You should only jump out if an aly keeps a scanner up. Otherwise your PSMs will explode when they lose track on the building. pssst


edit:Maybe this ^ is wrong. I am ot sure anymore, but mirvs will explode if a planets building turns out of their max range.



From what I've seen it's just a display error, they look like they blow up but if you watch the planet it takes damage after a few seconds when the bombs would've hit. Not 100% sure if PSMs work like that or not since I haven't tried it myself, but given that Mirv/Neutron seem to work fine it seems likely.
_________________
Adapt or die.

Goto page ( 1 | 2 Next Page )
Page created in 0.021277 seconds.


Copyright © 2000 - 2024 Palestar Inc. All rights reserved worldwide.
Terms of use - DarkSpace is a Registered Trademark of PALESTAR