Welcome aboard Visitor...

Daily Screenshot

Server Costs Target


Target met!

Latest Topics

- Anyone still playing from a decade ago or longer? »
- Game still active. NICE! »
- Password resett »
- Darkspace Idea/Opinion Submission Thread »
- Rank Bug maybe? »
- Next patch .... »
- Nobody will remember me...but. »
- 22 years...asking for help from one community to another »
- DS on Ubuntu? »
- Medal Breakpoints »

Development Blog

- Roadmap »
- Hello strangers, it’s been a while... »
- State of DarkSpace Development »
- Potential planetary interdictor changes! »
- The Silent Cartographer »

Combat Kills

Combat kills in last 24 hours:
No kills today... yet.

Upcoming Events

- Weekly DarkSpace
05/04/24 +4.3 Days

Search

Anniversaries

22th - Tellaris
17th - Oskar von Reuenthal

Social Media

Why not join us on Discord for a chat, or follow us on Twitter or Facebook for more information and fan updates?

Network

DarkSpace
DarkSpace - Beta
Palestar

[FAQ
Forum Index » » English (General) » » [Suggestion] AWAC/Long Range Radar Ship
Goto page ( Previous Page 1 | 2 )
 Author [Suggestion] AWAC/Long Range Radar Ship
Kenny_Naboo
Marshal
Pitch Black


Joined: January 11, 2010
Posts: 3823
From: LobsterTown
Posted: 2010-04-22 20:16   
Quote:

On 2010-04-22 19:17, Sops wrote:
Quote:

On 2010-04-22 08:50, Kenny_Naboo wrote:
Quote:

On 2010-04-22 08:08, Eledore Massis [R33] wrote:
Sensor Corvette
Long Range Scout
Talon

your ships.



But then you'd have to be up close to the enemy.


That is the point. Do it right and flying a sensor scout is already very easy.
Stop looking for an I win button.





It's not an "I win" button. It's just another function.
It's a ship with its inherent advantages and disadvantages.

Scouting is much easier. Just jump in close, hit the ECM to remain hidden and when you see the enemy, your entire faction does too.
_________________
... in space, no one can hear you scream.....


Zero28
Grand Admiral

Joined: August 25, 2006
Posts: 591
Posted: 2010-04-22 20:20   


Its not "I win", but its better than nothing.

Available in your local Staples Stores
[ This Message was edited by: Zero28 on 2010-04-22 20:20 ]
_________________
19:33:51 [ZION]GothThug {C?}: "Zero..you are DS's hero"

Rhiawhyn Zerinth
Fleet Admiral
Templar Knights


Joined: October 31, 2005
Posts: 257
From: I.C.C Deep space refueling station
Posted: 2010-04-22 22:58   
It is a good idea, just not for darkspace. if you want something which garentees you to be able to detect something monumentally far away, go elsewhere. this isint real life, so there are no reasons to HAVE a system like that. ALL SHIPS HAVE SIMILER SCANNERS


To give you an idea why we need the AWAC for long range detection, is that not everything has the ability to SEE that far, the horizon is a major thing for ground forces and a flying radar platform has a much further horizon, and can scan further. as a result its a mobile radar dish.

the other point is that tanks and infantry do not have radar nor the ability to see like that, they rely on the eye in the sky to get generalised information like that, artillery also can use that for long range spotting.

What happens when everyone can see the same distance with the same standard equipment that can be mounted on a corvette? everyone has it, it trivialises the need for a specialised ship for it. we have the sensor frigate, it does the same job with its 4+ scanners/eccm.

besides if you get your 15000gu detection range, i want my 200,000 gu range planetbuster dreadnouht which while has no armor and is easily killed (so people have to guard it) it can instantly kill anything it manages to hit. why? because we are talking about overpowered things nobody needs, so i might aswell drop my ideas aswell right?
_________________
death is not the greatest loss of life, the greatest lost of life is what dies inside of us while we live.



Kenny_Naboo
Marshal
Pitch Black


Joined: January 11, 2010
Posts: 3823
From: LobsterTown
Posted: 2010-04-22 23:34   
Quote:

On 2010-04-22 22:58, Rhiawhyn Zerinth wrote:
It is a good idea, just not for darkspace. if you want something which garentees you to be able to detect something monumentally far away, go elsewhere. this isint real life, so there are no reasons to HAVE a system like that. ALL SHIPS HAVE SIMILER SCANNERS


To give you an idea why we need the AWAC for long range detection, is that not everything has the ability to SEE that far, the horizon is a major thing for ground forces and a flying radar platform has a much further horizon, and can scan further. as a result its a mobile radar dish.

the other point is that tanks and infantry do not have radar nor the ability to see like that, they rely on the eye in the sky to get generalised information like that, artillery also can use that for long range spotting.

What happens when everyone can see the same distance with the same standard equipment that can be mounted on a corvette? everyone has it, it trivialises the need for a specialised ship for it. we have the sensor frigate, it does the same job with its 4+ scanners/eccm.

besides if you get your 15000gu detection range, i want my 200,000 gu range planetbuster dreadnouht which while has no armor and is easily killed (so people have to guard it) it can instantly kill anything it manages to hit. why? because we are talking about overpowered things nobody needs, so i might aswell drop my ideas aswell right?




Yup. I understand whatcha trying to say.

We're suppose to be able to scan infinitely far out there in space, but apparently we're limited to perhaps 5000gus or so, unless the target has a huge sig value.

Still, if it existed, I don't think that "everyone" will have a long range radar all of a sudden. This is a specific ship for a specific role, and not a piece of equipment or mod that can be mounted on any vessel. How many dictors do you see deployed per side most of the time? I'll bet it's just one. And it'll prob be the same for a radar ship.

You can't fly combat, so you're not gonna get pres in a hurry.
And you need to keep dodging enemy attention.

I don't think we're gonna see radar spamming, srsly.
_________________
... in space, no one can hear you scream.....


Kenny_Naboo
Marshal
Pitch Black


Joined: January 11, 2010
Posts: 3823
From: LobsterTown
Posted: 2010-04-22 23:38   
Quote:

On 2010-04-22 14:18, Max Kepler wrote:
The way this is initially suggested to work wouldn't work. If you wanted a Radar ship, you might be able to get away one of the following without screwing everything else up:

-The radar ship simply multiplies signature by a factor within some range. Ships with 5 now have 10, 10 have 20, etc. It would not help the detection of cloaked ships or ships with negative signature already (unless you wanted to give it a set increase to negative signature ships, maybe +3). If you wanted to go this route, the radar ship should be very vulnerable to K'luth attacks (Frigate or Scout Size with lots of energy drain to keep them from moving much), otherwise it's too hard for the lobsters. It would, however, give them some incentive to fly smaller ships that can hit and run the sensor ship before bringing in the big dreads.

-The radar ship makes all non-negative sig ships in some range visible under F2/Navigation, but has NO tactical effect.

-The radar ship is basically a giant ECCM but does NOT have a constant effect like regular ECCM. It can only ping once every, say, 15-20 seconds. You may even include the ability to detect cloaked ships (again, in this case, you'd want to make them vulnerable to K'luth). In this way, you can detect the presence of enemies but not have a definite tactical advantage over them.




Interesting concept, but I think we've overlooked one thing.

When the radar ship lights up, only the faction which owns the radar ship will be able to see everything within range on their scope.

If the other faction doesn't have a radar ship up, they don't see anything beyond what they normally see. The only thing new they'll pick up is the radar ship itself. Because as radar works.... when you emit, you're detectable at an even longer range by passive sensors then what you're able to detect.


So I think Sig values won't be usable. It shouldn't work like ECCM by raising all sigs.





[ This Message was edited by: Kenny_Naboo on 2010-04-22 23:40 ]
_________________
... in space, no one can hear you scream.....


Goto page ( Previous Page 1 | 2 )
Page created in 0.024124 seconds.


Copyright © 2000 - 2024 Palestar Inc. All rights reserved worldwide.
Terms of use - DarkSpace is a Registered Trademark of PALESTAR