Welcome aboard Visitor...

Daily Screenshot

Server Costs Target


9% of target met.

Latest Topics

- Anyone still playing from a decade ago or longer? »
- Game still active. NICE! »
- Password resett »
- Darkspace Idea/Opinion Submission Thread »
- Rank Bug maybe? »
- Next patch .... »
- Nobody will remember me...but. »
- 22 years...asking for help from one community to another »
- DS on Ubuntu? »
- Medal Breakpoints »

Development Blog

- Roadmap »
- Hello strangers, it’s been a while... »
- State of DarkSpace Development »
- Potential planetary interdictor changes! »
- The Silent Cartographer »

Combat Kills

Combat kills in last 24 hours:
No kills today... yet.

Upcoming Events

- Weekly DarkSpace
05/04/24 +1.0 Days

Search

Anniversaries

No anniversaries today.

Social Media

Why not join us on Discord for a chat, or follow us on Twitter or Facebook for more information and fan updates?

Network

DarkSpace
DarkSpace - Beta
Palestar

[FAQ
Forum Index » » Developer Feedback » » Tweaked defense bases = meh
 Author Tweaked defense bases = meh
MrSparkle
Marshal

Joined: August 13, 2001
Posts: 1912
From: mrsparkle
Posted: 2009-03-09 01:24   
There's virtually no difference, for Kluth bases anyway. Level 2 bases get mark II missiles, which is just a laggier spammier version of regular (two missiles instead of one). Level 3 bases get the regular level 1 base missiles plus torpedoes.

So for Kluth, level 1 gives regular Psi Missiles and a weak beam. Level 2 gives Psi Missile mark II which is two missiles, and a weak beam. Level 3 gives regular Psi Missiles, a torpedo which is decent vs close range, and a weak beam.

The missiles do very very little damage, and level 2 bases have the potential to create a lot of lag. For some reason instead of mark IIs being one missile with twice the damge, they're two missiles.

Defense base weapons should get a substantial damage increase, because I still don't see the point in upgrading to level 3 bases. It's possible that level 2 bases might be more desirable than level 1 now, but level 3? Nope. They require 90 tech, turn off if 1 lab is destroyed, and don't do enough damage at range to be worth it (close range damage should be a bonus exclusive to level 3, but not at the expense of ranged missile damage which is what's most important, besides point defense which is most important of all).

I haven't tested bombs vs level 3 bases yet.
_________________


t500
Marshal

Joined: June 20, 2007
Posts: 188
From: vermont
Posted: 2009-03-09 15:24   
ugto level 3 base has a PCANNON
icc level 3 base has a railgun
[ This Message was edited by: t500 on 2009-03-10 14:25 ]
_________________
luna nobis providet

  Email t500
MrSparkle
Marshal

Joined: August 13, 2001
Posts: 1912
From: mrsparkle
Posted: 2009-03-10 14:28   
Pcannon and railgun for level 3 bases huh? They have a lot more range than torpedoes, but unless they're very high level they aren't gonna do any damage.
_________________


Shigernafy
Admiral

Joined: May 29, 2001
Posts: 5726
From: The Land of Taxation without Representation
Posted: 2009-03-11 01:20   
Just have the level match the technology level... one volley of a Level 90 cannon could do some damage...
_________________
* [S.W]AdmBito @55321 Sent \"I dunno; the French had a few missteps. But they're on the right track, one headbutt at a time.\"

  Email Shigernafy
Sens [R33]
Admiral

Joined: September 27, 2008
Posts: 1020
From: Edge of th...
Posted: 2009-03-11 15:32   
what happened to the "one hit" problem
_________________
Proud member of the Order of the Gaifen
Founder and former Club chair of the Shigernafy Fan Club
Co-founder of the Doran Judication Comittee


  Email Sens [R33]
Page created in 0.012668 seconds.


Copyright © 2000 - 2024 Palestar Inc. All rights reserved worldwide.
Terms of use - DarkSpace is a Registered Trademark of PALESTAR