Welcome aboard Visitor...

Daily Screenshot

Server Costs Target


Target met!

Latest Topics

- Anyone still playing from a decade ago or longer? »
- Game still active. NICE! »
- Password resett »
- Darkspace Idea/Opinion Submission Thread »
- Rank Bug maybe? »
- Next patch .... »
- Nobody will remember me...but. »
- 22 years...asking for help from one community to another »
- DS on Ubuntu? »
- Medal Breakpoints »

Development Blog

- Roadmap »
- Hello strangers, it’s been a while... »
- State of DarkSpace Development »
- Potential planetary interdictor changes! »
- The Silent Cartographer »

Combat Kills

Combat kills in last 24 hours:
No kills today... yet.

Upcoming Events

- Weekly DarkSpace
05/04/24 +4.0 Days

Search

Anniversaries

22th - Tellaris
17th - Oskar von Reuenthal

Social Media

Why not join us on Discord for a chat, or follow us on Twitter or Facebook for more information and fan updates?

Network

DarkSpace
DarkSpace - Beta
Palestar

[FAQ
Forum Index » » Developer Feedback » » 2:1 Balance... needs to be balanced.
Goto page ( Previous Page 1 | 2 | 3 )
 Author 2:1 Balance... needs to be balanced.
Enterprise
Chief Marshal

Joined: May 19, 2002
Posts: 2576
From: Hawthorne, Nevada
Posted: 2008-08-05 13:45   
You're doing it wrong Co. ICC is not really a defensive faction so much as a 'run away' faction.

They get fast shield recharge, so, what you're supposed to do is basically, attack until you a.) run out of energy or b.) run out of ammo and then run away.

Yeah thats right, run away. Run away and get more ammo, or recharge your energy, and in that time frame your shields should be like OMGRECHURGE and then you have full shields and then you jump back in.

Then repeat. UGTO is supposed to outlast ICC, even though they aren't the defensive faction, so pretty much you have to rely on continual breaks in combat.




-Ent
_________________


Coeus
Grand Admiral
Sundered Weimeriners


Joined: March 22, 2006
Posts: 2815
From: Philly
Posted: 2008-08-05 13:49   
In the time that I got back to a friendly planet, regenned energy my armor had fully repaired thanks to depots and shields were still 50% So no. Doesn't work.
_________________
Do I really look like a guy with a plan?
'I'm gonna go crazy, and I'm taking you with me!'


ICC Security Council Chief Enforcer

  Email Coeus   Goto the website of Coeus
Enterprise
Chief Marshal

Joined: May 19, 2002
Posts: 2576
From: Hawthorne, Nevada
Posted: 2008-08-05 13:52   
Quote:

On 2008-08-05 13:49, Coeus {Bito Jr.} wrote:
In the time that I got back to a friendly planet, regenned energy my armor had fully repaired thanks to depots and shields were still 50% So no. Doesn't work.




Active shields.




-Ent
_________________


Coeus
Grand Admiral
Sundered Weimeriners


Joined: March 22, 2006
Posts: 2815
From: Philly
Posted: 2008-08-05 14:14   
They were, except the 2nd fore shield, that was reflective. That was at 75% when the others were at 50%
_________________
Do I really look like a guy with a plan?
'I'm gonna go crazy, and I'm taking you with me!'


ICC Security Council Chief Enforcer

  Email Coeus   Goto the website of Coeus
Bardiche
Chief Marshal

Joined: November 16, 2006
Posts: 1247
Posted: 2008-08-05 15:50   
My Station did 3% damage with lasers against an UGTO Transport. Beams seem not to do the damage they are supposed to do...
_________________


Enterprise
Chief Marshal

Joined: May 19, 2002
Posts: 2576
From: Hawthorne, Nevada
Posted: 2008-08-05 17:54   
Quote:

On 2008-08-05 15:50, Bardiche wrote:
My Station did 3% damage with lasers against an UGTO Transport. Beams seem not to do the damage they are supposed to do...





AI Transports are custom ships of their own kind, much much harder to kill.




-Ent
_________________


doda *EP5 no longer exception...*
Grand Admiral

Joined: December 11, 2005
Posts: 1012
From: happy land
Posted: 2008-08-06 00:13   
Quote:

On 2008-08-05 15:50, Bardiche wrote:
My Station did 3% damage with lasers against an UGTO Transport. Beams seem not to do the damage they are supposed to do...



well chem lasers are quite weak, heavy chem lasers on the otherhand...
_________________
Please resize your Admin - signature
VCA since June 5th 06

Fornax
Marshal
Raven Warriors

Joined: April 30, 2002
Posts: 906
From: Jacksonville, FL
Posted: 2008-08-06 12:56   
I think the 2:1 balance proposal was merely a goal and never a hard measurement. If it's a little above or below, it doesn't really matter as long as there is some rough parity between the factions as a whole.

However, I don't think a 3-5:1 ratio between ship hulls is a good idea - anything in the 1.5 - 2.5:1 range works to me.

What I guess I'm more concerned about is - the mid-July versus early-August reports. If the Assault Dreadnought (in particular) is coming up dry on power and largely losing because of it...and it wasn't in July, that suggests some sort of newly introduced problem to investigate.

Sure sounds like the power requirements of the Assault Dreadnought should be rebalanced. Generally, my opinion is that the ICC should be able to run at 50% speed and volley fire all ranged weapons plus about 50-75% of the power required to run the shields. Stationary ranged combat should not deplete power.

Nax
_________________


Junky Da FunkyMonke
Admiral

Joined: May 14, 2007
Posts: 347
From: The Hotel California, takes excursions to Deep Sexys Space every now and then
Posted: 2008-08-06 14:32   
i couldnt get a pirate frigate down pass 99% sheild in a BATTLE DREAD WTF
_________________


Goto page ( Previous Page 1 | 2 | 3 )
Page created in 0.039233 seconds.


Copyright © 2000 - 2024 Palestar Inc. All rights reserved worldwide.
Terms of use - DarkSpace is a Registered Trademark of PALESTAR