Welcome aboard Visitor...

Daily Screenshot

Server Costs Target


Target met!

Latest Topics

- Anyone still playing from a decade ago or longer? »
- Game still active. NICE! »
- Password resett »
- Darkspace Idea/Opinion Submission Thread »
- Rank Bug maybe? »
- Next patch .... »
- Nobody will remember me...but. »
- 22 years...asking for help from one community to another »
- DS on Ubuntu? »
- Medal Breakpoints »

Development Blog

- Roadmap »
- Hello strangers, it’s been a while... »
- State of DarkSpace Development »
- Potential planetary interdictor changes! »
- The Silent Cartographer »

Combat Kills

Combat kills in last 24 hours:
No kills today... yet.

Upcoming Events

- Weekly DarkSpace
04/27/24 +13.3 Hours

Search

Anniversaries

No anniversaries today.

Social Media

Why not join us on Discord for a chat, or follow us on Twitter or Facebook for more information and fan updates?

Network

DarkSpace
DarkSpace - Beta
Palestar

[FAQ
Forum Index » » Developer Feedback » » IDEA: Nuetron Fighter Bombers for UGTO
 Author IDEA: Nuetron Fighter Bombers for UGTO
Admiral Ackbar
Ensign

Joined: March 26, 2008
Posts: 108
From: Home One
Posted: 2008-07-10 08:06   
Why not kind of like the wasphoard i think this would be mainly for the use in an Agincourt Carrier - cmon make it happen guys [and if this has been suggested or is being used my bad]
-
post yer arguments below i know ya got em
_________________




Drafell
Grand Admiral
Mythica

Joined: May 30, 2003
Posts: 2449
From: United Kingdom
Posted: 2008-07-10 08:19   
Neutron bombs haven't yet been developed that are small enough to be mounted on a fighter, and yet still be capable of surviving atmospheric re-entry.

Fighter bombing already enables players to circumvent the risk involved with planetary bombardment. Fighter based neuts would make things too easy.
_________________
It's gone now, no longer here...Yet still I see, and still I fear.rnrn
rnrn
DarkSpace Developer - Retired

  Goto the website of Drafell
Admiral Ackbar
Ensign

Joined: March 26, 2008
Posts: 108
From: Home One
Posted: 2008-07-11 23:17   
oh ok lol thanks for the reply
_________________




|Kakashi|
Fleet Admiral

Joined: April 04, 2007
Posts: 448
Posted: 2008-07-12 00:49   
I think that it would of been a good idea
It'd be good for fleet that only allow neut bombing ect...
_________________


Supertrooper
Marshal
Pitch Black


Joined: March 18, 2004
Posts: 1895
From: Maryland, U.S.A
Posted: 2008-07-12 02:25   
Quote:

On 2008-07-12 00:49, $parx™ wrote:
It'd be good for fleet that only allow neut bombing ect...




Fleet's that ban mirving for nueting are rather stupid.

Nuetron's hit the planet the same as Mirvs, accept Mirvs destroy everything. Their both broke, one is just a lesser evil.
_________________


  Email Supertrooper
Junky Da FunkyMonke
Admiral

Joined: May 14, 2007
Posts: 347
From: The Hotel California, takes excursions to Deep Sexys Space every now and then
Posted: 2008-07-13 00:25   
Quote:

On 2008-07-12 02:25, Crim {OLIOLIO} wrote:
Quote:

On 2008-07-12 00:49, $parx™ wrote:
It'd be good for fleet that only allow neut bombing ect...




Fleet's that ban mirving for nueting are rather stupid.

Nuetron's hit the planet the same as Mirvs, accept Mirvs destroy everything. Their both broke, one is just a lesser evil.



When in the service one should always choose the lesser of to weevils, err i mean evils
_________________


Page created in 0.016130 seconds.


Copyright © 2000 - 2024 Palestar Inc. All rights reserved worldwide.
Terms of use - DarkSpace is a Registered Trademark of PALESTAR