Welcome aboard Visitor...

Daily Screenshot

Server Costs Target


9% of target met.

Latest Topics

- Anyone still playing from a decade ago or longer? »
- Game still active. NICE! »
- Password resett »
- Darkspace Idea/Opinion Submission Thread »
- Rank Bug maybe? »
- Next patch .... »
- Nobody will remember me...but. »
- 22 years...asking for help from one community to another »
- DS on Ubuntu? »
- Medal Breakpoints »

Development Blog

- Roadmap »
- Hello strangers, it’s been a while... »
- State of DarkSpace Development »
- Potential planetary interdictor changes! »
- The Silent Cartographer »

Combat Kills

Combat kills in last 24 hours:
No kills today... yet.

Upcoming Events

- Weekly DarkSpace
05/04/24 +21.1 Hours

Search

Anniversaries

No anniversaries today.

Social Media

Why not join us on Discord for a chat, or follow us on Twitter or Facebook for more information and fan updates?

Network

DarkSpace
DarkSpace - Beta
Palestar

[FAQ
Forum Index » » English (General) » » some EAD reaserch
Goto page ( 1 | 2 | 3 Next Page )
 Author some EAD reaserch
Leonide
Grand Admiral
Templar Knights


Joined: October 01, 2005
Posts: 1553
From: Newport News, Virginia
Posted: 2007-12-18 02:24   
i done some reaserch tonight on saving energy with the EAD. i found some interesting things. it requires use of some ICC technology, but it pays off in the end.

energy saving mod:

5 level 4 HCL's ( saves energy and has faster reload time)
all level 10 Fusion torpedoes (faster fire rate, lower energy, quicker projecticle)
2 level 10 Flux beams
rest level 8 Railguns

EDIT:
setup number 2:
5 level 5 HCL's
level 10 fusion torpedoes
level 7 Particle cannons
two level 10 Flux cannons in full mount cannon slot for point defense
two AME's and two PFE drives.

this second setup has slightly better energy reserves than the first mod, with more firepower.

if you use these mods, i can garuntee you if you run 10 gu or 11 gu /second in battle, the energy drain will be a LOT less than with all UGTO technology. if you just stick to cannons, and the F torps, you will have barely any energy drain on your ship. save the HCL's and QST for hull, as usual. and the old warning applies - NEVER fly your EAD alone.. EVER.


i hope this small guide helps.

[ This Message was edited by: leonide on 2007-12-18 20:47 ]
_________________


captain of the ICC Assault Cruiser C.S.S. Sledgehammer

  Email Leonide
Little Pet Slinki
Admiral

Joined: April 16, 2006
Posts: 836
From: United Kingdom, South West.
Posted: 2007-12-18 09:53   
I do like this, EAD should be a long range weapon used to deter planet campers, or a short and sweet attack vessel, designed not to be in battle for more than 3 minutes.

Leonides option is the long range one, obviously with the railguns offering better firing range, and the HCL offering SOME ship to ship combat, or at least some PD, since the ship should have an escort.

Good Job!
_________________


  Goto the website of Little Pet Slinki
Smartin
Grand Admiral

Joined: August 04, 2005
Posts: 1107
From: Michigan
Posted: 2007-12-18 10:25   
I'll save jack the time...


The EAD still sucks.


_________________


DarkSpace Community Website

  Email Smartin
Redemption (Angel of Light)
Grand Admiral
Interstellar Cultural Confederation United


Joined: October 12, 2006
Posts: 181
Posted: 2007-12-18 10:40   
SMARTIN OWNZERD YOU
_________________



  Email Redemption (Angel of Light)   Goto the website of Redemption (Angel of Light)
BackSlash
Marshal
Galactic Navy


Joined: March 23, 2003
Posts: 11183
From: Bristol, England
Posted: 2007-12-18 10:43   
@Leo - nice guide. Has some problems though, which I shall address along with :

Quote:

On 2007-12-18 09:53, Little Pet Slinki wrote:
I do like this, EAD should be a long range weapon used to deter planet campers, or a short and sweet attack vessel, designed not to be in battle for more than 3 minutes.

Leonides option is the long range one, obviously with the railguns offering better firing range, and the HCL offering SOME ship to ship combat, or at least some PD, since the ship should have an escort.

Good Job!



...

The EAD is designed to be an insanely hard hitting, close-quarter combat ship. It is never, ever going to be turned into a long range battle platform - ever.

It's also desgined to stay in the battle as long as it can (more than three minutes). It's the most heavily armoured ship the humans poses, and is supposed to have the 'best' energy management system out of all the dreads. The reason for that energy management system is so it can support the insane energy requirement of UGTO weapons, as the EAD has to fit a lot of them along with rather heavy hitting QST's and HCL's (both of which are generaly flawed in design this version (but then again, what isn't?)).

Unfortunately, although this solution/guide does help the energy management, you're taking away from the EAD the one thing it lacks more than an energy management system (or it's (currently) terrible armour) - and that's fire-power. No matter what you do with the EAD, you're going to have to compromise in some area, and this is not something the UGTO do well. They're designed to be all-rounders, with the EAD being their "Ship of the Line" (best combat ship they're able to put into play for those that don't know).

No matter what you do to the EAD, it will never come close to the ship it's supposed to be this version. And that makes me very sad indeed.
_________________


SaturnShadow™ *FC*(Angel Of Darkness)
Marshal
*Renegade Space Marines*


Joined: February 03, 2007
Posts: 310
From: UK
Posted: 2007-12-18 10:46   
not really smartin my EAD with 6 P cannons lvl 8, 4 Psi cannons lvl 8, Pulse beam lvl 10, and beacon lvl 10, 4 PFE lvl 10, AMJD lvl 10, 8 AM torps lvl 10, 3 aux gens lvl 2, 5 HCL lvl 10 is awsome i can get at least 5 QSTs out of it before i run out of energy
_________________



Little Pet Slinki
Admiral

Joined: April 16, 2006
Posts: 836
From: United Kingdom, South West.
Posted: 2007-12-18 10:48   
I was merely trying to put a useful and nice post towards leonides Idea because he was feeling bad

And Yes this version its crap, so why not use it in a completely differen't way than it was mean't to be used, otherwise it's not used at all
_________________


  Goto the website of Little Pet Slinki
Fatal Command (CO)
Marshal
Fatal Squadron


Joined: November 27, 2002
Posts: 1158
From: over here in New York noticing some ppl are like canoes.....they need to be paddled.
Posted: 2007-12-18 11:39   
I'll let you all in on a secret.....
ALL THE FREAKING SHIPS SUCK/
class for class...No ship is what it should be.
_________________


  Email Fatal Command (CO)
Fattierob
Vice Admiral

Joined: April 25, 2003
Posts: 4059
Posted: 2007-12-18 12:01   
solution to EAD problem: more HCL's that don't suck energy
_________________


Ham&Swiss
Grand Admiral

Joined: October 12, 2004
Posts: 418
From: 10$ to whoever finds me
Posted: 2007-12-18 12:12   
Quote:

On 2007-12-18 12:01, Fattierob (x2 3x 11"/52 SK C/28) wrote:
solution to EAD problem: more HCL's that don't suck energy




no, no, no, fattie, the REAL solution to the EAD is about 6-7 hungry mandi's....
_________________
If violence doesn't work, Your not using enough!

Leonide
Grand Admiral
Templar Knights


Joined: October 01, 2005
Posts: 1553
From: Newport News, Virginia
Posted: 2007-12-18 14:08   
Quote:

On 2007-12-18 12:01, Fattierob (x2 3x 11"/52 SK C/28) wrote:
solution to EAD problem: more HCL's that don't suck energy




Amen Fattie!
_________________


captain of the ICC Assault Cruiser C.S.S. Sledgehammer

  Email Leonide
GothThug {C?}
Fleet Admiral

Joined: June 29, 2005
Posts: 2932
Posted: 2007-12-18 14:17   
or just replace the 2 Rear Facing Torps with Cannons
_________________


  Email GothThug {C?}
Fattierob
Vice Admiral

Joined: April 25, 2003
Posts: 4059
Posted: 2007-12-18 16:05   
Quote:

On 2007-12-18 14:17, GothThug {C?} wrote:
or just replace the 2 Rear Facing Torps with 2 Front Facing Torps



fix'd

What part of "assault" do you not understand?
_________________


Enterprise
Chief Marshal

Joined: May 19, 2002
Posts: 2576
From: Hawthorne, Nevada
Posted: 2007-12-18 16:29   
Quote:

...with the EAD being their "Ship of the Line"...





EAD is far too specialized to be a ship of the line. EAD more fits the description of its namesake - an assault ship.


Also yes, Jack pointed out what I was going to. You can cut down on energy but then you do horrible damage. HCLs do sod all damage and not worth the energy cost and railguns are just as pathetic.

In otherwords, using the EAD right now is pointless, when there is a far more useful ship, that better fits the description of a ship of the line, which would be the Battle Dreadnought.

If you want to lob QSTs, get a Battle Station.




-Ent
_________________


Leonide
Grand Admiral
Templar Knights


Joined: October 01, 2005
Posts: 1553
From: Newport News, Virginia
Posted: 2007-12-18 18:46   
Quote:

On 2007-12-18 16:29, Enterprise wrote:
Quote:

...with the EAD being their "Ship of the Line"...





EAD is far too specialized to be a ship of the line. EAD more fits the description of its namesake - an assault ship.


Also yes, Jack pointed out what I was going to. You can cut down on energy but then you do horrible damage. HCLs do sod all damage and not worth the energy cost and railguns are just as pathetic.

In otherwords, using the EAD right now is pointless, when there is a far more useful ship, that better fits the description of a ship of the line, which would be the Battle Dreadnought.

If you want to lob QSTs, get a Battle Station.




-Ent




i realize that point, and i have done further reaserch. apparently, when i install two AME drives and two PFE drives, i get more energy for my weapons with slightly more, if not the same acceleration as all IE drives. thustly, i have upgraded the HCL's to level 5 from level 4 and installed all level 7 Particle cannons with improved energy usage.


[ This Message was edited by: leonide on 2007-12-18 18:46 ]
_________________


captain of the ICC Assault Cruiser C.S.S. Sledgehammer

  Email Leonide
Goto page ( 1 | 2 | 3 Next Page )
Page created in 0.021712 seconds.


Copyright © 2000 - 2024 Palestar Inc. All rights reserved worldwide.
Terms of use - DarkSpace is a Registered Trademark of PALESTAR