Welcome aboard Visitor...

Daily Screenshot

Server Costs Target


9% of target met.

Latest Topics

- Anyone still playing from a decade ago or longer? »
- Game still active. NICE! »
- Password resett »
- Darkspace Idea/Opinion Submission Thread »
- Rank Bug maybe? »
- Next patch .... »
- Nobody will remember me...but. »
- 22 years...asking for help from one community to another »
- DS on Ubuntu? »
- Medal Breakpoints »

Development Blog

- Roadmap »
- Hello strangers, it’s been a while... »
- State of DarkSpace Development »
- Potential planetary interdictor changes! »
- The Silent Cartographer »

Combat Kills

Combat kills in last 24 hours:
No kills today... yet.

Upcoming Events

- Weekly DarkSpace
05/04/24 +1.1 Days

Search

Anniversaries

No anniversaries today.

Social Media

Why not join us on Discord for a chat, or follow us on Twitter or Facebook for more information and fan updates?

Network

DarkSpace
DarkSpace - Beta
Palestar

[FAQ
Forum Index » » Developer Feedback » » Seperating Planet Defence and Planet Point Defence
 Author Seperating Planet Defence and Planet Point Defence
Fattierob
Vice Admiral

Joined: April 25, 2003
Posts: 4059
Posted: 2007-04-13 10:20   
Basically, right now, we have two planet defence buildings in darkspace.

Fighter Base III
Defence Base III

I'm suggesting we split this up to:

Fighter Base III (Where, perhaps, you have to select what kind of fighters you want the bases to spawn(Ie: bombers, fighters, or intercepters. moot idea, maybe)
Anti Ship Base III (This, obviously, fires anti-ship weapons. ICC would get a (long range) fusion torp and a railgun, UGTO would get a (long range) proton torp and a particle cannon and k'luth would get an AM torp and one psi cannon (Note: If psi cannons start lagging people out, maybe it can be changed to two AM torps, or to a disruptor)
Point Defence Base III (This fires anit-MIRV weapons and such. ICC get a point defence lazor, UGTO get a chemical laser, and k'luth get a disruptor)

I'm also thinking that perhaps the point defence base range should be increased, so it can start targeting bombs immediatly (ie: from <=1kgu of it).

Anyway, just some random idea I had.
_________________


Peter Wiggin
Midshipman

Joined: November 10, 2005
Posts: 636
Posted: 2007-04-13 22:06   
I agree with the range increase, but I have a dif suggestion..

Disruptors: 1000
Chemical Lasers: 750
Pulse Beams: 500


The disruptors are the ones that need to be able to shoot first. Make it harder to bomb luth as right now you just turn away at 400 and you are fine. Either that or increase the speed of them, as damage doesnt really matter when it comes to PD.



4 ICC def bases could take out the bombs. then you have these assault bases. The bomber has to turn away sooner so even less bombs hit, requiring even more players to bomb because if you dont neutron(which will probably be more strategic in 484) you have to get through the shields. With shields being stronger and bombs being weaker, this will be a LOT harder.
_________________


Enterprise
Chief Marshal

Joined: May 19, 2002
Posts: 2576
From: Hawthorne, Nevada
Posted: 2007-04-14 16:45   
Not cannons for Anti-Ship. Lasers. Big, long range ones.

And point defense lasers: More than one per pd-base.




-Ent
_________________


Page created in 0.010142 seconds.


Copyright © 2000 - 2024 Palestar Inc. All rights reserved worldwide.
Terms of use - DarkSpace is a Registered Trademark of PALESTAR