| Author |
A quick question about Dreads |
Peter Wiggin
Midshipman
Joined: November 10, 2005
Posts: 636
|  Posted: 2007-03-28 01:17
wait.. why would you add REAR torpedos? *scratches head*
_________________
|
BackSlash
Marshal
Galactic Navy
Joined: March 23, 2003
Posts: 11183
From: Bristol, England
| Posted: 2007-03-28 07:28
Quote:
|
On 2007-03-28 01:17, Peter Wiggin wrote:
wait.. why would you add REAR torpedos? *scratches head*
|
|
Why does the EAD have rear torpedos?
Lots of why's in 1.483.
_________________
|
Sixkiller
Marshal
Courageous Elite Commandos
Joined: May 11, 2005
Posts: 1786
From: Netherlands
| Posted: 2007-03-28 07:32
from Startrek!
The Enterprise has rear torpedos
_________________
|
Eledore Massis [R33]
Grand Admiral
Templar Knights
Joined: May 26, 2002
Posts: 2694
From: tsohlacoLocalhost
| Posted: 2007-03-28 10:39
WO II
the german Type IXB U-Boat already had rear facing torpedo tubes.
and manny more types had those.
so what is wrong with rear facing tubes. ok apply to k'luth makes no sence since if you pass your target you realy want to cloak instaid of firing a extra salvo of torps.
_________________
DS Discordion
|
BackSlash
Marshal
Galactic Navy
Joined: March 23, 2003
Posts: 11183
From: Bristol, England
| Posted: 2007-03-28 11:50
Quote:
|
On 2007-03-28 10:39, FIR3T0N3[NL] //PSYCHO\ wrote:
WO II
the german Type IXB U-Boat already had rear facing torpedo tubes.
and manny more types had those.
so what is wrong with rear facing tubes. ok apply to k'luth makes no sence since if you pass your target you realy want to cloak instaid of firing a extra salvo of torps.
|
|
Because on assault dreads, they fire so slowly, they never, ever hit the target - coupled with the masses of armour on 1.483 ships, they don't do any damage - you need a full volley of 8+ to do anything (if they hit).
_________________
|
English
Deutsch
Nederlands
)
