Welcome aboard Visitor...

Daily Screenshot

Server Costs Target


9% of target met.

Latest Topics

- Anyone still playing from a decade ago or longer? »
- Game still active. NICE! »
- Password resett »
- Darkspace Idea/Opinion Submission Thread »
- Rank Bug maybe? »
- Next patch .... »
- Nobody will remember me...but. »
- 22 years...asking for help from one community to another »
- DS on Ubuntu? »
- Medal Breakpoints »

Development Blog

- Roadmap »
- Hello strangers, it’s been a while... »
- State of DarkSpace Development »
- Potential planetary interdictor changes! »
- The Silent Cartographer »

Combat Kills

Combat kills in last 24 hours:
No kills today... yet.

Upcoming Events

- Weekly DarkSpace
05/11/24 +3.5 Days

Search

Anniversaries

19th - Server

Social Media

Why not join us on Discord for a chat, or follow us on Twitter or Facebook for more information and fan updates?

Network

DarkSpace
DarkSpace - Beta
Palestar

[FAQ
Forum Index » » Developer Feedback » » AM Reactors (Kluth only)
Goto page ( Previous Page 1 | 2 )
 Author AM Reactors (Kluth only)
Russian Roulette with Muskets
Grand Admiral

Joined: September 04, 2002
Posts: 393
Posted: 2003-09-04 15:38   
Quote:

On 2003-09-04 15:07, Cobra 1-1 wrote:

The AM Reactor has a special substance to keep the AM under control
if u cause enough damage to the reactor once u took care of the ships armor and destroyed the reactors armor (i decided to give the AM Reactor a Heavy armor to prevent the Reactor from getting too much damage that the "shielding" around the AM develops a breach,AM goes out the breach ur ship is destroyed from within) it will go critical u lose ur ship when that happens.

AM Reactors are made to be quite hard to destroy so this may not happen
to u but i decided to add that risk to balance out the power advantage u gain from using them





giving the reactor damage protection negates that "get blow when damaged thing" eh?

by the time you worked down the armor of the reactor the ships is dead anyway, so all that stuff is kind of worthless, except for kluth wich will be able to volley torp after torp and never run out of juice.


Short:
More power for kluth (or anyone alese for that matter) = Bad !
You, stop posting such dumb ideas = Good !



_________________
- In firepower we trust. - I'm not buying this! -we ran out of firepower.

Gideon
Cadet

Joined: September 14, 2001
Posts: 4604
From: Oregon, USA
Posted: 2003-09-04 15:41   
We are currently exploring having all ships (including K'Luth) be, overall, more power hungry, not less. This runs counter to including some extra powerful reactor.


We also seem to be against any devices that fall under the category of "exploding your ship for no good reason" as this seems to hurt overall play experience.
_________________
...and lo, He looked upon His creation, and said, "Fo shizzle."

  Email Gideon
Antdizzle


Joined: February 07, 2003
Posts: 860
Posted: 2003-09-04 18:34   
Am reactors? (omg you must be in a sad mood if you need am reators on kluth)
_________________


Goto page ( Previous Page 1 | 2 )
Page created in 0.009863 seconds.


Copyright © 2000 - 2024 Palestar Inc. All rights reserved worldwide.
Terms of use - DarkSpace is a Registered Trademark of PALESTAR