Welcome aboard Visitor...

Daily Screenshot

Server Costs Target


84% of target met.

Latest Topics

- so i talked with Massi »
- See Commands »
- Now the fun begins »
- Qand answers have returned »
- Call to Arms »
- All Species 8572 Report in »
- hi there »
- Anyone still playing from a decade ago or longer? »
- Game still active. NICE! »
- help me »

Development Blog

- Roadmap »
- Hello strangers, it’s been a while... »
- State of DarkSpace Development »
- Potential planetary interdictor changes! »
- The Silent Cartographer »

Combat Kills

Combat kills in last 24 hours:
No kills today... yet.

Upcoming Events

- Weekly DarkSpace
11/23/24 +1.2 Days

Search

Anniversaries

No anniversaries today.

Social Media

Why not join us on Discord for a chat, or follow us on Twitter or Facebook for more information and fan updates?

Network

DarkSpace
DarkSpace - Beta
Palestar

[FAQ
Forum Index » » Developer Feedback » » Cloak Suggestion
 Author Cloak Suggestion
Junky Da FunkyMonke
Admiral

Joined: May 14, 2007
Posts: 347
From: The Hotel California, takes excursions to Deep Sexys Space every now and then
Posted: 2007-11-24 18:49   
I got to thinking about cloaks and beacons. What if every time a beacon hit a Kluth ship and the cloak was on it would drain more energy to try to cover up the larger signature. What do you guys think?
_________________


Leonide
Grand Admiral
Templar Knights


Joined: October 01, 2005
Posts: 1553
From: Newport News, Virginia
Posted: 2007-11-24 19:31   
that is what it used to do, but it was like that for ECCM. the more ECCM around, the more energy it used.
_________________


captain of the ICC Assault Cruiser C.S.S. Sledgehammer

  Email Leonide
Junky Da FunkyMonke
Admiral

Joined: May 14, 2007
Posts: 347
From: The Hotel California, takes excursions to Deep Sexys Space every now and then
Posted: 2007-11-24 22:43   
Oh so why was this taken out it seemed like a good idea to me..

_________________


Enterprise
Chief Marshal
Raven Warriors

Joined: May 19, 2002
Posts: 2576
From: Hawthorne, Nevada
Posted: 2007-11-24 23:19   
Quote:

On 2007-11-24 22:43, Junky the FunkyMonke wrote:
Oh so why was this taken out it seemed like a good idea to me..





Because it WASN'T a good idea. This was back in the days when Kluth didn't even have armor.

Yeah. Take a moment to digest that one.

It pretty much rendered cloak useless. Even one ECCM would disable a Kluth fairly quickly, and you could even pass by planets too close or it sucked you dry in an instant.

The idea of beacons doing this is a little bit better, but I can just see it encouraging spamming because throw a ton on there and the energy would be gone faster than a Kluth can decloak.

I'm more partial to the idea that beacons simply make it so that it takes longer and much more energy for a Kluth to cloak the more beacons it has.




-Ent
_________________


Junky Da FunkyMonke
Admiral

Joined: May 14, 2007
Posts: 347
From: The Hotel California, takes excursions to Deep Sexys Space every now and then
Posted: 2007-11-25 00:27   
Ok Ent thanks for pointing that out.
_________________


Page created in 0.009910 seconds.


Copyright © 2000 - 2024 Palestar Inc. All rights reserved worldwide.
Terms of use - DarkSpace is a Registered Trademark of PALESTAR