On 2013-06-13 13:28, Supreme Commander~Ray[OU] wrote:
Looks like it was from something eles, IE Another game that never saw Light or a movie or something. However it would look nice if you coverd it up a bit (Im not much of a fan for haveing ship parts Exposed such as the aft of that ship) Somebody took a lot of time on that thing...Perhaps you should do a little research on it, dont want DS to get slammed with a lawsuit for copyright crap.

On 2013-06-13 14:05, Schroedingers Gun wrote:

Quote: On 2013-06-13 13:28, Supreme Commander~Ray[OU] wrote: Looks like it was from something eles, IE Another game that never saw Light or a movie or something. However it would look nice if you coverd it up a bit (Im not much of a fan for haveing ship parts Exposed such as the aft of that ship) Somebody took a lot of time on that thing...Perhaps you should do a little research on it, dont want DS to get slammed with a lawsuit for copyright crap.

thats because its from Babylon 5

EAS is short for Earth Alliance Ship

it was the 1st earth alliance ship to use artificial gravity instead of using rotation sections like the older Omega class destroyer it replaced. It also had organic components derived from Shadow tech. It was designed to equal the Minbari Sharlin cruiser in combat ability. The most powerful EA ship until the Excalibur was built.


*end geek mode*



Lol Achilles approves of Babylon 5 geeks.

On 2013-06-13 21:46, Fluttershy wrote:
It looks like it might make for a good T3 ICC destroyer if it was greatly simplified in detail, but kept the main shape.

On 2013-06-14 05:45, Xavier I. Agamemnon wrote:
I love the EAS Warlock its design is so beautiful so simple. the reason its not a battleship or a cruiser because the B5 universe dosnt use classes the same way as on the shows ie the Hyperion is a Cruiser and has less armament than an omega destroyer the same with with a nova destroyer with has more armament then a omega with out the turning section of the omega. but i havent ever seen a battleship in b5 i could be mistaken what i have seen is that it goes like corvette cruiser destroyer.


oh and the Excalibur is not an EA Ship it a lone from the ISA to go find a cure of the drakh plague.
[ This Message was edited by: Schroedingers Gun on 2013-06-14 14:34 ]

On 2013-06-14 14:32, Schroedingers Gun wrote:

Quote: On 2013-06-14 05:45, Xavier I. Agamemnon wrote: I love the EAS Warlock its design is so beautiful so simple. the reason its not a battleship or a cruiser because the B5 universe dosnt use classes the same way as on the shows ie the Hyperion is a Cruiser and has less armament than an omega destroyer the same with with a nova destroyer with has more armament then a omega with out the turning section of the omega. but i havent ever seen a battleship in b5 i could be mistaken what i have seen is that it goes like corvette cruiser destroyer. oh and the Excalibur is not an EA Ship it a lone from the ISA to go find a cure of the drakh plague. [ This Message was edited by: Schroedingers Gun on 2013-06-14 14:34 ]

if i recall correctly each race in B5 was different. yes the classes don't match up to DS ships, the Hyperion was a Battle cruiser while the Warlock was a destroyer which seems odd by DS sizing. having looked it up the the Nova class was a dreadnought (source Ships of the Galaxy for the B5 rpg).

The Minbari Sharlin while larger than any EA ship was only classed as a war cruiser.

To add to the confusion of ship size/classes in the B5 verse the Excalibur (Victory class) was only a destroyer.

The more i look at it the more i realise that in the B5 verse,class category a ship is in is down to what race builds it and what its designed to do. the Nova class dreadnought is 1450m long while the Victory class destroyer is 3000m long. It's all just one big mess of too many conditions and circumstances to take in to account.



also now i feel the need to have a B5 marathon again. damit