Welcome aboard Visitor...

Daily Screenshot

Server Costs Target


84% of target met.

Latest Topics

- The birth of Negavolt... »
- so i talked with Massi »
- See Commands »
- Now the fun begins »
- Qand answers have returned »
- Call to Arms »
- All Species 8572 Report in »
- hi there »
- Anyone still playing from a decade ago or longer? »
- Game still active. NICE! »

Development Blog

- Roadmap »
- Hello strangers, it’s been a while... »
- State of DarkSpace Development »
- Potential planetary interdictor changes! »
- The Silent Cartographer »

Combat Kills

Combat kills in last 24 hours:
No kills today... yet.

Upcoming Events

- Weekly DarkSpace
11/30/24 +6.3 Days

Search

Anniversaries

No anniversaries today.

Social Media

Why not join us on Discord for a chat, or follow us on Twitter or Facebook for more information and fan updates?

Network

DarkSpace
DarkSpace - Beta
Palestar

[FAQ
Forum Index » » Soap Box » » Battle Stations
Goto page ( 1 | 2 Next Page )
 Author Battle Stations
Alzek15
Admiral

Joined: October 27, 2011
Posts: 75
From: A metaverse far, far away
Posted: 2012-02-03 06:24   
Has anyone ever considered how much more useful bttle stations would be if they had their factions respective cannons instead of like 20 lasers.
_________________
\"Never argue with an idiot. They will drag you down to their level and beat you with experience.\" - Mark Twain

  Email Alzek15
The Fridge
Chief Marshal
Templar Knights


Joined: December 13, 2008
Posts: 559
From: In Your Fridge, Eating your Foods.
Posted: 2012-02-03 06:43   


as if 6-8 weren't enough >.>

[ This Message was edited by: The Fridge on 2012-02-03 06:44 ]
_________________



Forger of Destiny
Chief Marshal
We Kick Arse


Joined: October 10, 2009
Posts: 826
Posted: 2012-02-03 08:19   
think he meant cannons, not core weapons

stations have place for loooooooots of cannons, if they lost their beams. they would easily beat all the cannon dreads. and if they retain their superawesome core weps, they would be fear-incarnations for all admiral aspirants

also, compare 20 heavy cannons, and as many as 100 projectiles being tracked by dearest server; with 20 beams which dont cause much lag.

but i do wish that ugto and icc weapon stations get some measure of medium range cannon power. its kinda "not fair" to the kluth nest if the enemy has almost equal beam damage and better defenses.

so...
+1 to BattleStat receiving half a dozen, and LineStat receiving a dozen, heavy cannons

and someone pls give devs reason to make kluth disruptor beams stronger and remove some range weapons from luth big ships
_________________
Forging legends and lives outside till naught remains inside.


Borgie
Chief Marshal
Pitch Black


Joined: August 15, 2005
Posts: 2256
From: close by
Posted: 2012-02-03 08:44   
lets make stations even more over powered, and widely used. that sounds like a wonderful idea
_________________


  Email Borgie
DiepLuc
Chief Marshal

Joined: March 23, 2010
Posts: 1187
Posted: 2012-02-03 11:12   
Quote:
On 2012-02-03 06:24, Alzek15 wrote:
Has anyone ever considered how much more useful bttle stations would be if they had their factions respective cannons instead of like 20 lasers.


Yup.
Has anyone ever considered how much more useful support/command station would be if they had supply/building drone instead of like 8 missles/fighters? Oh, and name your station I love PEACE.
How wonderful they are!
_________________


Alzek15
Admiral

Joined: October 27, 2011
Posts: 75
From: A metaverse far, far away
Posted: 2012-02-03 14:08   
You dont have to replace all the lasers(cuz then u would have no pd) just some of them so battle stations dont have to get up close to EADs or Siphons to fight them, cuz they'll probably lose that fight.
_________________
\"Never argue with an idiot. They will drag you down to their level and beat you with experience.\" - Mark Twain

  Email Alzek15
jimjimjaroo
Grand Admiral

Joined: March 06, 2009
Posts: 308
From: Michigan, USA
Posted: 2012-02-03 14:36   
Quote:

On 2012-02-03 08:19, Compromisery wrote:
+1 to BattleStat receiving half a dozen, and LineStat receiving a dozen, heavy cannons



exactly what i was thinking but lets not leave kluth out of the picture. lets give them something. i know kluth is a short ranged faction but it wont hurt to pet some cannons on their nest (unless they have some already, i've really gotten screwed after the layout changes).
_________________


Brutality
Marshal

Joined: May 25, 2009
Posts: 659
From: Alaska, USA
Posted: 2012-02-03 14:54   
Quote:

On 2012-02-03 14:36, jimjim578 wrote:
Quote:

On 2012-02-03 08:19, Compromisery wrote:
+1 to BattleStat receiving half a dozen, and LineStat receiving a dozen, heavy cannons



exactly what i was thinking but lets not leave kluth out of the picture. lets give them something. i know kluth is a short ranged faction but it wont hurt to pet some cannons on their nest (unless they have some already, i've really gotten screwed after the layout changes).




The battle station(layout) is supposed to be close range only. if we add cannons, we will be back where we were with stat spamming again because it would easily be the best thing to fly for mid/close range. -_-
_________________


Alzek15
Admiral

Joined: October 27, 2011
Posts: 75
From: A metaverse far, far away
Posted: 2012-02-03 15:06   
It wouldn't have to be many cannons, just enough as to be a deterrence. think about this, using the biggest, slowest ships as a close up brawler that can do almost nothing until it gets in laser range. That just doesn't seem practical.
_________________
\"Never argue with an idiot. They will drag you down to their level and beat you with experience.\" - Mark Twain

  Email Alzek15
Boerenkool
Marshal

Joined: December 18, 2007
Posts: 218
Posted: 2012-02-03 15:19   
i dont like medium ranged enhanced...a mass battle station spam would be way to effective. a single station would beat almost any ship it meets. keep variety in the ships, keep em focused on one or 2 purposes imo. so long-med range attacker, close-long range, close-med. not close-med-long range. or close range attacker-electronic warfare, long range-construction, etc.

hey wait that is alrdy the case as it is now! lets keep it that way.....
_________________
The greatest trick the devil ever pulled, was convincing the world he is a bot

Kenny_Naboo
Marshal
Pitch Black


Joined: January 11, 2010
Posts: 3823
From: LobsterTown
Posted: 2012-02-03 15:56   
Quote:

On 2012-02-03 14:36, jimjim578 wrote:
exactly what i was thinking but lets not leave kluth out of the picture. lets give them something. i know kluth is a short ranged faction but it wont hurt to pet some cannons on their nest (unless they have some already, i've really gotten screwed after the layout changes).




Was that a matter of irrelevant enh on your ships after the layout change?
Just detach your enh from your stations and refit them onto something else then.



_________________
... in space, no one can hear you scream.....


jimjimjaroo
Grand Admiral

Joined: March 06, 2009
Posts: 308
From: Michigan, USA
Posted: 2012-02-03 16:05   
Quote:

On 2012-02-03 15:56, Kenny_Naboo[+R] wrote:
Quote:

On 2012-02-03 14:36, jimjim578 wrote:
exactly what i was thinking but lets not leave kluth out of the picture. lets give them something. i know kluth is a short ranged faction but it wont hurt to pet some cannons on their nest (unless they have some already, i've really gotten screwed after the layout changes).




Was that a matter of irrelevant enh on your ships after the layout change?
Just detach your enh from your stations and refit them onto something else then.






its not the matter of enh just that i dont remember much of the new layouts.
_________________


jimjimjaroo
Grand Admiral

Joined: March 06, 2009
Posts: 308
From: Michigan, USA
Posted: 2012-02-03 16:12   
Quote:

On 2012-02-03 14:54, Corrupting Brutality wrote:

The battle station(layout) is supposed to be close range only. if we add cannons, we will be back where we were with stat spamming again because it would easily be the best thing to fly for mid/close range. -_-



perhaps the devs could make it where the particle cannons range within 500gu or something.
_________________


Princess Celestia
Marshal

Joined: July 03, 2011
Posts: 165
From: The Crystal Empire.
Posted: 2012-02-03 19:05   
Quote:

On 2012-02-03 14:08, Alzek15 wrote:
You dont have to replace all the lasers(cuz then u would have no pd) just some of them so battle stations dont have to get up close to EADs or Siphons to fight them, cuz they'll probably lose that fight.



*facepalm* EAD and Battle Station are UGTO.

its AD and siphons and Gangheli that stats worry bout useually.
_________________


Princess Celestia
Marshal

Joined: July 03, 2011
Posts: 165
From: The Crystal Empire.
Posted: 2012-02-03 19:10   
Quote:

On 2012-02-03 06:24, Alzek15 wrote:
Has anyone ever considered how much more useful bttle stations would be if they had their factions respective cannons instead of like 20 lasers.



also for all stations. its Core weapons and Beams, so ingenereal the difrent factions get there respective missle,

a Combat station of some type with loads of beams and Core weapons

and a Command stat with 4 cores and some beams and 8 fighters. so ingeneral they are all usefull when used properly. if you use a SS and a BS toghere the BS gets unlimted QST to spam makeing it a deadly weapon platform it beat up my poor SS.
_________________


Goto page ( 1 | 2 Next Page )
Page created in 0.187376 seconds.


Copyright © 2000 - 2024 Palestar Inc. All rights reserved worldwide.
Terms of use - DarkSpace is a Registered Trademark of PALESTAR