| Author |
UGTO |
Lark of Serenity
Grand Admiral
Raven Warriors
Joined: June 02, 2002
Posts: 2516
|  Posted: 2010-06-20 16:58
EAD needs an additional fore armour
picket dessie needs more beams, possibly a second generator.
BD energy drain is 0 with all cannons going, its a bit scary
_________________
Admiral Larky, The Wolf
Don't play with fire, play with Larky.
Raven Division Command - 1st Division
|
Rebellion
Marshal
Faster than Light
Joined: June 20, 2009
Posts: 730
From: sol
| Posted: 2010-06-20 17:01
Quote:
|
On 2010-06-20 16:58, Lark of Serenity wrote:
EAD needs an additional fore armour
|
|
i beg to differ it has plenty it can servive a AD frontal attack for some time
_________________
\"War does not decide who is right, but who is left\"
\"I stopped fighting my inner demons we're on the same side now\"
|
Pyruvic
Fleet Admiral
Interstellar Cultural Confederation United
Joined: May 30, 2005
Posts: 18
From: CST - USA
| Posted: 2010-06-20 17:04
Psssh, ICC CD needs better arcs. I mean, seriously, who ever actually manages to shoot off their missiles in combat?
_________________
|
Lark of Serenity
Grand Admiral
Raven Warriors
Joined: June 02, 2002
Posts: 2516
| Posted: 2010-06-20 17:04
my experience was that the AD could rotate shields to fore and last longer than the EAD, which was problematic because the EAD is a fore-firing ship and loses its edge when it has to turn to keep damage off the front.
_________________
Admiral Larky, The Wolf
Don't play with fire, play with Larky.
Raven Division Command - 1st Division
|
-Daedalus-
Grand Admiral
Joined: September 26, 2006
Posts: 549
| Posted: 2010-06-20 17:21
ICC AC needs the full armor/shields on the rear.
_________________
|
Rebellion
Marshal
Faster than Light
Joined: June 20, 2009
Posts: 730
From: sol
| Posted: 2010-06-20 17:38
Quote:
|
On 2010-06-20 17:04, Lark of Serenity wrote:
my experience was that the AD could rotate shields to fore and last longer than the EAD, which was problematic because the EAD is a fore-firing ship and loses its edge when it has to turn to keep damage off the front.
|
|
true but sheilds are supposed to make us have some type of advantage? am i right? and EAD dose more damage then AD in one alpha so thay may not last as long but thay will do just as much or more damage then an AD even tho a AD may be able to live slightly longer thats cuz it cant do as much damage in one alpha. (i have tested this)
i rest my case EAD vs AD is very balenced if u ask me and it all depend on the Pilot
_________________
\"War does not decide who is right, but who is left\"
\"I stopped fighting my inner demons we're on the same side now\"
|
BackSlash
Marshal
Galactic Navy
Joined: March 23, 2003
Posts: 11183
From: Bristol, England
| Posted: 2010-06-20 17:40
BD does not have zero energy drain, nor does the EAD need more armour.
The EAD is lacking when compared to the AD, but this does not mean it needs more armour (which would increase it's mass an insane amount making it even slower).
_________________
|
Borgie
Chief Marshal
Pitch Black
Joined: August 15, 2005
Posts: 2256
From: close by
| Posted: 2010-06-20 20:32
EAD is already an overpowered ship comapired to AD. and you want to give it more armor.. are you outta your mind?
_________________
|
jamesbob
Grand Admiral
Joined: August 22, 2009
Posts: 410
| Posted: 2010-06-20 23:58
Quote:
|
On 2010-06-20 17:21, Daedalus wrote:
ICC AC needs the full armor/shields on the rear.
|
|
excuse me the torp cruiser suffers from the same problem on account of the missing defence modual for WEAPONS
_________________
|
Great Budda
Fleet Admiral
Pitch Black
Joined: January 01, 2008
Posts: 157
From: Omaha, NE
| Posted: 2010-06-21 00:12
Quote:
|
On 2010-06-20 23:58, jackbob wrote:
excuse me the torp cruiser suffers from the same problem on account of the missing defence modual for WEAPONS
|
|
But isn't this true with all three VA cruisers (Assault, Torpedo, and Scale)?
_________________
|
jamesbob
Grand Admiral
Joined: August 22, 2009
Posts: 410
| Posted: 2010-06-21 00:13
Quote:
|
On 2010-06-21 00:12, Great Budda wrote:
Quote:
|
On 2010-06-20 23:58, jackbob wrote:
excuse me the torp cruiser suffers from the same problem on account of the missing defence modual for WEAPONS
|
|
But isn't this true with all three VA cruisers (Assault, Torpedo, and Scale)?
|
|
yes it is yet the guy i origionaly quoted on wants it just on assault cruiser
_________________
|
DiepLuc
Chief Marshal
Joined: March 23, 2010
Posts: 1187
| Posted: 2010-06-21 05:25
Quote:
|
On 2010-06-20 16:58, Lark of Serenity wrote:
EAD needs an additional fore armour
picket dessie needs more beams, possibly a second generator.
BD energy drain is 0 with all cannons going, its a bit scary
|
|
Lark, your problem is you're a very agressive , extremly furious, incredibly tyrannic, exceedingly ruthless, greatly atrocious, etc. girl! That's all.
_________________
|
Kaoschan
Fleet Admiral
Interstellar Cultural Confederation United
Joined: October 11, 2008
Posts: 133
From: Germany
| Posted: 2010-06-21 05:31
EAD is fine, AD is fine ...
but i think the CD is a bit ... lets say its arcs are not the best (*wink wink* missiles)
remove them and give it 2-4 normal railgun with 180° instead
_________________
In ICC Shields with Defence Mode we trust!
K'luth Hunter - Recon ~Ping~ Scout - ECCM for the Team, to beat the K'luth!
|
Fornax
Marshal
Raven Warriors
Joined: April 30, 2002
Posts: 906
From: Jacksonville, FL
| Posted: 2010-06-21 05:43
Just like Fighters are always a full arc, Missiles should always be the same too.
_________________
|
Kaoschan
Fleet Admiral
Interstellar Cultural Confederation United
Joined: October 11, 2008
Posts: 133
From: Germany
| Posted: 2010-06-21 06:00
Quote:
|
On 2010-06-21 05:43, Fornax wrote:
Just like Fighters are always a full arc, Missiles should always be the same too.
|
|
That would make every Missile Ship too powerfull
_________________
In ICC Shields with Defence Mode we trust!
K'luth Hunter - Recon ~Ping~ Scout - ECCM for the Team, to beat the K'luth!
|
English
Deutsch
Nederlands
)
