Author |
Cap the ship, keep the ship. |
Musiqsoulman Grand Admiral *Renegade Space Marines*
Joined: November 26, 2005 Posts: 209 From: Italy
| Posted: 2006-03-04 21:05  
Here's my idea:
When you cap a ship, the enemy guy that was riding his ship, finds himself in his homegate, and since you've capped his ship, you find his ship in your garage.
So basiccly if me, Ugto, caps an Icc Escort dessie, I'll be able to fly that dessie as Ugto, sort of like the same thing that happens with weapons already, Icc or luth weapons on Ugto ship or viceversa.
Interesting point: People with friends on other faction could arrange planned capping of enemy's ships, you can easily avoid that by HEAVILY demoting in pres, people that get his ship capped. And since you'd loose a a consistent amount of pres if you have your ship capped, it is necessary to make the capping quite hard to happen.
What do you think? wouldn't that be awesome? capping others factions ships and fly them for your faction!!!!
_________________
|
Doran Chief Marshal Galactic Navy
Joined: March 29, 2003 Posts: 4032 From: The Gideon Unit
| Posted: 2006-03-04 21:17  
Quote:
|
On 2006-03-04 21:05, musiqsoulman wrote:
Interesting point: People with friends on other faction could arrange planned capping of enemy's ships, you can easily avoid that by HEAVILY demoting in pres, people that get his ship capped.
|
|
sounds like sploits to me
why, yes it is.
Quote:
|
Description: Members of different teams/factions cooperating for mutual prestige gain (IE, build/bomb runs, attack/repair runs, capture/capture runs). |
|
[ This Message was edited by: Doran on 2006-03-04 21:18 ]
_________________
|
Musiqsoulman Grand Admiral *Renegade Space Marines*
Joined: November 26, 2005 Posts: 209 From: Italy
| Posted: 2006-03-04 21:19  
well the very high pres loss is meant to avoid exploiting of people taking advantage of this.
If you start loosing 5-10 times the amount of pres you'd loose with a normal ship destroyed, then you'll think 10 times before exploiting the system.
_________________
|
BackSlash Marshal Galactic Navy
Joined: March 23, 2003 Posts: 11183 From: Bristol, England
| Posted: 2006-03-04 21:39  
Quote:
|
On 2006-03-04 21:19, musiqsoulman wrote:
well the very high pres loss is meant to avoid exploiting of people taking advantage of this.
If you start loosing 5-10 times the amount of pres you'd loose with a normal ship destroyed, then you'll think 10 times before exploiting the system.
|
|
You lose a lot of pres for capping a ship...
Riiiiiight...
_________________
|
Shigernafy Admiral
Joined: May 29, 2001 Posts: 5726 From: The Land of Taxation without Representation
| Posted: 2006-03-04 22:04  
Not capping, for being capped.
Though as there's no skill-based way to avoid being capped (ie, its random) it doesn't seem fair to lose more pres that way than for dying in battle, where theoretically skill has bearing. I don't think that would fly with a lot of people.
_________________ * [S.W]AdmBito @55321 Sent \"I dunno; the French had a few missteps. But they're on the right track, one headbutt at a time.\"
|
Light-of-Aurora Grand Admiral
Joined: December 01, 2003 Posts: 602 From: NJ, USA
| Posted: 2006-03-04 22:51  
IMHO, it's bad enough we were able to mount other faction's technology. In games imo it's best for each faction to be a distinct and unique, not factions that are named differently but otherwise the same.
_________________
|
Borgie Chief Marshal Pitch Black
Joined: August 15, 2005 Posts: 2256 From: close by
| Posted: 2006-03-04 23:18  
i see what hes saying if i cap kluth i should be able to fly that kluth ship, but then again there is ways around of getting a ship illegaly so.. i guess thats why its better to let the computer pilot that ship
_________________
|
Obiwan Kenobi Grand Admiral
Joined: January 14, 2005 Posts: 99 From: Mooresboro , North Carolina United States
| Posted: 2006-03-05 01:04  
well then perhaps instead of allowing a player to fly it make the ai on the capped ship a little more "brains" or perhaps a command system should be implemented for them. would be interesting to have a computer controlled ship covering your tail while your bombing or whatever
_________________ Do or Do Not, There is no Try.
|
Musiqsoulman Grand Admiral *Renegade Space Marines*
Joined: November 26, 2005 Posts: 209 From: Italy
| Posted: 2006-03-05 09:59  
hmm yes probably this idea is much more intelligent.
IF you get the chance let's say, to cap a dread, you can have that dread covering you while bombing on protecting you in battles.
_________________
|
Musiqsoulman Grand Admiral *Renegade Space Marines*
Joined: November 26, 2005 Posts: 209 From: Italy
| Posted: 2006-03-05 10:00  
double posting sorry.......
[ This Message was edited by: musiqsoulman on 2006-03-05 10:01 ]
_________________
|
Likkarn *Freelance* 2nd Rear Admiral
Joined: December 29, 2005 Posts: 148 From: Gresham, Oregon. USA.
| Posted: 2006-03-05 12:46  
You can delete those, Music. I think an AI controlled buddie that you captured is a great idea. Personally I think this game needs some kind of AI. Like AI Mobs so newbies can kill somthing. I dont think the servers can handle it though. Still, AI capped ships. Great idea. Of course, youll end up seeing things like a dread followed by an entire fleet of newbie's ships. If you were to do this, id say put a limit of ships to like, 3 or somthing. That way you cant have your own privately owned army following you areound just beacuse you happen to be lucky with some infs. Oh, and you might think about an idea for planet defence ive been thinking about. Sentry Guns. You buildt them in factorys, just like weapons, then put them in your hold, fly to where you want them at, and hit Deploy. They will stay ancored to that spot, and shoot at anything that isint your Faction. Different variations for each fleet, of course. K'luth: cheaper and faster to build, but weaker. Mabye stealth. ICC: Average build time. Shield. Mabye have weaker guns. UGTO: Takes longer to build, and very expensive. Heavy armor. Decent weapons. Make the tracking slow to balance the firepower.
Now, you might have different variations. ECM, ECCM, Scout, Long range, Short range, Interdictor, EMP, Missle, Anti-Missle, Anti-Bomb, Shield Generator(For ICC), Stealth Generator(For K'luth), Orbit ability(for UGTO), Selfdestruct(mines), Repair, Reload, Energy recovery, And my personal favorite idea. It will be available to all the factions, but it will be the most expensive one of all. HUNTER-SEEKER: A variation of the Selfdestruct version, exept this one will move. When you deploy it, it will take a second to find a target. It will randomly target any enemy, and jump to their location, and detonate. Now, I dont really know how this is going to work, beacuse new players will want to know why they just blew up. But like I said, this is just an idea. I really want to hear you guy's oppinions.
_________________ Im back... Again.
|
Bobamelius Grand Admiral Galactic Navy
Joined: October 08, 2002 Posts: 2074 From: Ohio
| Posted: 2006-03-05 14:58  
I think you should just get money for capping ships...
Although I also like the idea of AI squadron-mates (a la EV Nova)
_________________
|
Dwarden Admiral CHIMERA
Joined: June 07, 2001 Posts: 1072 From: Czech Republic
| Posted: 2006-03-07 10:33  
many games which allows exchange of technologies between "races" got various preventions to abuse of such exchange:
for example:
- limited use (as You are not the real owner of technology then your skill to master it is lower than original specie, so effectivity factor goes down)
- limited ammo (You cant resupply after depleting)
- repair issues (again not technology developed by You so harder to maintain or repair, easier to full destroy and loose)
- increased power usage (tapping unknown technologies into own system goes at cost of higher power needs)
- operating system / computer incompatibility ... use of alien technology can results into other system malfunctions in same moment ...
and so on
_________________ ... Ideas? ... that's Ocean w/o borders !
|
BackSlash Marshal Galactic Navy
Joined: March 23, 2003 Posts: 11183 From: Bristol, England
| Posted: 2006-03-07 10:35  
We already have faction tech that's avaiable to swap IF you can get the other factions hub... Why do we need to include ships?
I just think it's silly. Edventually, it'll just get to the stage where everyone wants to cap another factions ship to use on their home faction.
_________________
|
Borgie Chief Marshal Pitch Black
Joined: August 15, 2005 Posts: 2256 From: close by
| Posted: 2006-03-07 14:09  
Quote:
|
On 2006-03-05 14:58, Bobamelius -R33- wrote:
I think you should just get money for capping ships...
Although I also like the idea of AI squadron-mates (a la EV Nova)
|
|
yeah that would be kinda cool have a md as an escort for my command dred
_________________
|