Welcome aboard Visitor...

Daily Screenshot

Server Costs Target


Target met!

Latest Topics

- Reminiscing »
- Holly Cow Its alive!! »
- Messenger Battle Chat by T-Roy! »
- Getting our Player Base back »
- Fully customizable ships? »
- First Person view is possible in DS! »
- What's with the new Metaverse? »
- Carrier default loadouts - ships w/interceptors only? »
- 01001000 01100101 01101100 01101100 01101111 »
- the mi type ships cheat »

Development Blog

- Roadmap »
- Hello strangers, it’s been a while... »
- State of DarkSpace Development »
- Potential planetary interdictor changes! »
- The Silent Cartographer »
- Cloaking update... »
- Tools for tips »
- Fleet levels and more! »
- Game Mechanics Question and Answer Thread »
- Under Construction »

Combat Kills

Combat kills in last 24 hours:
Kills chart
Killboard

Upcoming Events

- Weekly DarkSpace
08/24/19 +2.3 Days
- International Talk like a Pirate Day!
09/19/19 +27.6 Days
- Towel Day
05/25/20 +276.6 Days

Search

 

Anniversaries

No anniversaries today.

Facebook & Twitter

Why not follow us on Twitter or Facebook for more information and fan updates?

[FAQ
Forum Index » » Beta Testing Discussion » » 100% PD barren
 Author 100% PD barren
DiepLuc
Chief Marshal

Joined: March 23, 2010
Posts: 1187
Posted: 2011-05-09 16:14   
I have successfully built a 100%PD barren, with a little exploit power bug.
Progress
  1. Reach 70 pop with 2 biosphere and 80 tech, then build variance and Bomb I.
  2. Upgrade 2 biosphere to 2 automated and drop to 50 pop, continue to build bomb I.
  3. Delete Cortex and Subscpace, build bomb I until the planet reaches 100%.

Result
  • 1 Colony + 1 Lab + 2 Automated Farm + 4 dome + 4 variance = 50 food + 50 pop + 20 tech + 210 power.
  • 20 Bomb 1 = 100% PD.

Status
  • Worker: 50/41/+9
  • Power: 210/210/0

With 100% PD, a barren is an absolute defense. No matter how many bomber are bombing, it is not harmed. No matter how many red inf are landing, they can not raze any structure or kill any green inf on it. It's just a barren. You must bring at least 4 stations to capture it because of 32 inf = 3.2 ships.

Hereby announcing the fact, I suggest:
Bomb I
  • 3% PD
  • 20 tech
  • 20 power
  • 1 worker

Bomb II
  • 6% PD
  • 60 tech
  • 30 power
  • 4 worker

Hydrid I
  • 2% PD
  • 40 tech
  • 15 power
  • 2 worker

Hydrid II
  • 5% PD
  • 80 tech
  • 25 power
  • 5 worker

Offense I
  • 1% PD
  • 30 tech
  • 10 power
  • 3 worker

Offense II
  • 4% PD
  • 70 tech
  • 20 power
  • 6 worker

Bomb, Hydrid, Offense requires highest power, technology, worker respectively. Build at X technology and function at X technology; unlike build at X technology and function unless X-10 technology. I suggest so because I notice Hydrid II or Bomb I are everywhere due to its soft requirement.

Interdictor, Sensor ought to have its requirement adjusted too, but it's not crucial.

I didn't test with ICC shield generator because you can't have 100% PD with a shield on a barren and you don't need shield on 100% PD planet. I think we may remove planetary shield and planetary anti-sensor out of the game.

I didn't test on Ice/Ocean/Arid/Terran in binary system so I don't know what is the maximum PD one can get.
[ This Message was edited by: chlorophyll on 2011-05-09 16:45 ]
_________________


BackSlash
Marshal
Galactic Navy


Joined: March 23, 2003
Posts: 11180
From: Bristol, England
Posted: 2011-05-09 16:27   
This won't be possible after the next update. Max is 80% with 20x PD I's.
_________________


  Goto the website of BackSlash
Tommas [ USF HunnyBunny ]
Chief Marshal
Pitch Black


Joined: February 04, 2006
Posts: 581
From: Norway
Posted: 2011-05-09 16:33   
Well the planet still do zero damage i recon so it will only stop bombing and inf rushing..but 4 ships or ai is still easy cap..
_________________


Enterprise
Chief Marshal
Galactic Navy


Joined: May 19, 2002
Posts: 2576
Posted: 2011-05-09 17:44   
Quote:

On 2011-05-09 16:33, Tommas [ USF HunnyBunny ] wrote:
Well the planet still do zero damage i recon so it will only stop bombing and inf rushing..but 4 ships or ai is still easy cap..




Not as easy as it used to be.




-Ent
_________________


MrSparkle
Marshal

Joined: August 13, 2001
Posts: 1910
From: mrsparkle
Posted: 2011-05-09 20:06   
Quote:


I didn't test with ICC shield generator because you can't have 100% PD with a shield on a barren and you don't need shield on 100% PD planet. I think we may remove planetary shield and planetary anti-sensor out of the game.



Why don't you need shield on a 100% PD planet? I've been told PD is not point defense (chance to shoot down bombs and inf), but planetary defense which is damage reduction.

Is it that 100% PD means bombs and enemy infantry do zero damage? That's messed up if true.
[ This Message was edited by: General Zod on 2011-05-09 20:07 ]
_________________


Reznor
Marshal

Joined: March 29, 2010
Posts: 316
Posted: 2011-05-10 15:03   
Quote:

On 2011-05-09 20:06, General Zod wrote:
Quote:


I didn't test with ICC shield generator because you can't have 100% PD with a shield on a barren and you don't need shield on 100% PD planet. I think we may remove planetary shield and planetary anti-sensor out of the game.



Why don't you need shield on a 100% PD planet? I've been told PD is not point defense (chance to shoot down bombs and inf), but planetary defense which is damage reduction.

Is it that 100% PD means bombs and enemy infantry do zero damage? That's messed up if true.
[ This Message was edited by: General Zod on 2011-05-09 20:07 ]




Yes, it does zero damage. It also gives a bonus to allied infantry, meaning that ENEMY infantry do no damage either.



Planets need more bite, imo.
_________________
Indictor: 1. To accuse of wrongdoing

Interdictor: (DS) A planetary emplacement or Cruiser Class vessel capable of preventing FTL travel in a certain radius.

Steveyk
Chief Marshal
Non Omnis Moriar


Joined: November 25, 2008
Posts: 162
Posted: 2011-05-10 18:30   
It's 100% pointless defence.


_________________


  Email Steveyk
MrSparkle
Marshal

Joined: August 13, 2001
Posts: 1910
From: mrsparkle
Posted: 2011-05-10 18:31   
More anti ship, less damage reduction IMO. 80% is too much considering how easy it is to attain, and 100% is obviously broken. On the flipside, stations built with offense bases, especially level II offense bases, aren't enough of a threat.

Offense bases need more damage and range.
_________________


Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group
Page created in 0.010357 seconds.


Copyright © 2000 - 2019 Palestar Inc. All rights reserved worldwide.
Terms of use - DarkSpace is a Registered Trademark of PALESTAR