Welcome aboard Visitor...

Daily Screenshot

Server Costs Target


29% of target met.

Latest Topics

- Fully customizable ships? »
- Getting our Player Base back »
- What's with the new Metaverse? »
- Carrier default loadouts - ships w/interceptors only? »
- Holly Cow Its alive!! »
- 01001000 01100101 01101100 01101100 01101111 »
- the mi type ships cheat »
- First Person view is possible in DS! »
- Latency Issues »
- missing dll. »

Development Blog

- Roadmap »
- Hello strangers, it’s been a while... »
- State of DarkSpace Development »
- Potential planetary interdictor changes! »
- The Silent Cartographer »
- Cloaking update... »
- Tools for tips »
- Fleet levels and more! »
- Game Mechanics Question and Answer Thread »
- Under Construction »

Combat Kills

Combat kills in last 24 hours:
Kills chart
Killboard

Upcoming Events

- Weekly DarkSpace
06/22/19 +3.0 Days
- International Talk like a Pirate Day!
09/19/19 +91.2 Days
- Towel Day
05/25/20 +340.2 Days

Search

 

Anniversaries

No anniversaries today.

Facebook & Twitter

Why not follow us on Twitter or Facebook for more information and fan updates?

[FAQ
Forum Index » » Beta Testing Discussion » » In-game Typos
 Author In-game Typos
YIIMM
Grand Admiral

Joined: June 16, 2005
Posts: 849
From: Barcino, Hispania Tarraconensis
Posted: 2006-06-01 08:50   
Firstly, I'm not going to argue for anything said below to be implemented immediately, rather the opposite. So this is just a reference for a few small things to change after everything else has been done.

In the game there are several misspelt words for the tech and ships, so I'm going to propose that this thread be the one where people point them out.


Missile Dreadnaught should be Missile Dreadnought. (either spelling is acceptable, but it seemed to be the only ICC one with it spelt that way.

Urdaniam should be Urdanium

Manadible should be Mandible

Cyrometals should be Cryometals

Resession should be Recession

XB-11 Anialator should be XB-11 Anihilator


That's all I can find for now, and apologies if this has already been done.
_________________


Crim
Fleet Admiral
Sundered Weimeriners


Joined: March 16, 2003
Posts: 1331
Posted: 2006-06-01 12:01   
Faust was drunk when he did this..
_________________


Guyton (Angel of Death)
Marshal

Joined: January 25, 2004
Posts: 701
Posted: 2006-06-01 20:38   
Quote:

On 2006-06-01 12:01, Crimson {Fear?} wrote:
Faust was drunk when he did this..




lmao
_________________
www.twitch.tv/watchtowerr

thundercat984
Cadet

Joined: December 31, 2005
Posts: 166
From: southern us
Posted: 2006-06-06 02:56   
i was wondering if the i was supposed to be lower case in MiRV.
_________________


  Email thundercat984
Crim
Fleet Admiral
Sundered Weimeriners


Joined: March 16, 2003
Posts: 1331
Posted: 2006-06-06 06:11   
I think it is.. No clue.
_________________


Eledore Massis [R33]
Fleet Admiral
Templar Knights


Joined: May 26, 2002
Posts: 2690
From: tsohlacoLocalhost
Posted: 2006-06-06 08:55   
maby becous the MiRV's used in DS are not the MIRV we know.
MIRV : Multitpe Indipendently targetable Rentry Vehicle
MRV : Multiple Reentry vehicle

a MIRV deploys multiple warheads on diferent targets.
a MRV desplys multiple warheads on a single target.
in DS we target a single object to bomb. so this would make them MRV's
than why do we need a "i" ? and is fo what dous it stand for.
you tell me.
_________________
DS Discordion

YIIMM
Grand Admiral

Joined: June 16, 2005
Posts: 849
From: Barcino, Hispania Tarraconensis
Posted: 2006-06-06 14:48   
I think they're still supposed to be MIRVs, you could argue that once they enter a planet's atmosphere the warheads separate and just happen to land all in the same place

In release:

Nicea Remnence should be Nicea Remnants
_________________


Eledore Massis [R33]
Fleet Admiral
Templar Knights


Joined: May 26, 2002
Posts: 2690
From: tsohlacoLocalhost
Posted: 2006-06-08 07:11   
Quote:
On 2006-06-06 14:48, YIIMM wrote:
I think they're still supposed to be MIRVs, you could argue that once they enter a planet's atmosphere the warheads separate and just happen to land all in the same place

Quote:
a MIRV deploys multiple warheads on diferent targets.
a MRV desplys multiple warheads on a single target.


i beleave you stil sugest to a MRV
single target = same place.


however in game you notice splash damdamage from the bombs to surrounding structures. it could be that the bombs split and detonate in a circular shape around the target making optimal damage on the target and structures surrounding that target.
Than it would be a MiRV since each of the warheads targets a diferent place.
_________________
DS Discordion

Leviatan
Cadet

Joined: April 22, 2005
Posts: 186
Posted: 2006-06-08 09:44   
Quote:

On 2006-06-01 08:50, YIIMM wrote:

XB-11 Anihilator



XB-11 Annihilator
_________________


Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group
Page created in 0.115106 seconds.


Copyright © 2000 - 2019 Palestar Inc. All rights reserved worldwide.
Terms of use - DarkSpace is a Registered Trademark of PALESTAR